« Advertising markets in everything | Main | Oh Ye of little faith »

The Taiwanese war against tax evasion

This passage reminded me of the Greg Mankiw student who wanted to boost spending through destruct-lotteries on dollar bills.  But this is a way to encourage tax reporting:

It seems tax evasion was a problem for the government in a country where credit cards are not widely accepted and small business transacts most business.  The government hit upon the idea of a sales lottery rather than a sales tax.  Every sales receipt has a lottery number printed on its back.  Once a month, the government publishes several newspaper pages of winning numbers.  You can win anywhere between $5 and about $200 if you have a lucky sales receipt.

The government’s theory was everybody would demand a sales receipt if they had a chance of winning a lottery.  You play anytime you make a purchase; no matter how small a purchase.  The result is, as the island has become more prosperous, most people don’t want to bother with combing through thousands of lucky numbers in a newspaper once a month to maybe win $5.  Charities stepped in.  Along many streets you see clear plastic canisters promoting various charitable causes soliciting your sales receipts.  Retired volunteers go over the numbers on receipts collected.  It gives non profits a source of funding and gives old people a steady way to contribute without hard physical labor.  The Yngge Ceramics Museum I visited last Saturday collected sales receipts instead of charging admission.  If you were without a sales receipt (unlikely in this country) you could run across the street to 7-11 and buy a piece of candy for pennies and come back with a sales receipt.

Here is the full story and thanks to Joel Cretan for the pointer.  Read the whole post, it makes many other interesting points about Taiwan.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on March 28, 2009 at 01:17 PM in Law | Permalink

Comments

Haha, way late to the game. We already have a market for paper that pays off sporadically. Isn't it called MBS?

Posted by: Andrew at Mar 28, 2009 1:33:56 PM

It seems like this the charity aspect of this will be short-lived. It won't be long before technology develops that lets you cheaply scan your sales receipt and check it against an online database of numbers, limiting the inconvenience and eliminating the incentive to give away the receipts. Of course, this would not reduce the use of receipts as currency.

Posted by: Zac at Mar 28, 2009 1:53:35 PM

Argentina tried this back in the 90's. It didn't work very well. After a while the effect died down.

Posted by: Pablo at Mar 28, 2009 2:12:41 PM

A lot of the cultural differences seem predicated on a somewhat lower cost of labor. The lottery's one, and I'm also thinking of the meter maid in particular.

Posted by: athelas at Mar 28, 2009 2:34:21 PM

"This passage reminded me of the Greg Mankiw student who wanted to boost spending through destruct-lotteries on dollar bills."

Could someone tell me what this is in reference to?

Posted by: David at Mar 28, 2009 2:42:33 PM

----

"This passage reminded me of the Greg Mankiw student who wanted to boost spending through destruct-lotteries on dollar bills."

Could someone tell me what this is in reference to?

----

http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2009/03/reloading-weapons-of-monetary-policy.html

Posted by: John at Mar 28, 2009 2:57:09 PM

This is the case on the Chinese mainland as well. I'm not sure which began the habit. In China, it's a scratch-off ticket. The restaurants will often directly pay most of the winners under 100RMB.

There's also a demand for receipts as some employees are allowed a tax-free reimbursement for expenses they can show receipts for. Most of the expats I know are always in search of extra receipts to fill out their monthly quota.

If you don't want a receipt, you can usually negotiate the price down quite a lot.

Posted by: Sean at Mar 28, 2009 2:57:17 PM

It'll do less harm than the War on Drugs, I dare say, or the War on Terrorists whom America disapproves of.

Posted by: dearieme at Mar 28, 2009 3:16:53 PM

The State of Sao Paulo in Brazil has a similar program but instead of giving you lottery tickets it gives you tax rebates.

Posted by: Luis Alves at Mar 28, 2009 3:59:02 PM

Venezuela tried it with more expenses than new income

Posted by: k at Mar 28, 2009 8:47:50 PM

I'm not sure what the conceptual link is between Mankiw's student's idea and the Taiwanese receipt system. The latter exists here and now, while the former is basically inconceivable except in some hypothetical nightmarish economic future. Negative interest rates and dollar-bill destruction couldn't be implemented except in an environment of strict currency controls and FDR-style bans on private ownership of gold, otherwise if people are forced to use 'em or lose 'em they'll spend their dollars by buying euros and Krugerrands.

Posted by: anonymous at Mar 28, 2009 10:24:10 PM

"Everyone would demand"
"Most people don't bother"
Does this compute?

Posted by: lee at Mar 28, 2009 11:33:48 PM

I live in Taiwan, and I just won $8 when I went through my receipts yesterday.

Posted by: David Jinkins at Mar 29, 2009 10:38:05 AM

Just to note, this is not at all new in Taiwan. They were already doing this in the mid-90's, as I recall. Personally, I loved going through my receipts, and indeed won small amounts a few times.

Posted by: wugong at Mar 29, 2009 11:27:59 PM

In mainland China I've been offered been offered small gifts *not* to take the scratchcard/tax receipt. I've also had restaurants attempting to give already-scratched receipts, receipts for lower amounts, etc.

Posted by: Seektruthfromfacts at Mar 31, 2009 2:05:42 AM

This system was already in place when I went to Taiwan in 1989. Initially, only the major chain stores offered the official (lottery) receipts. Over the years, increasing numbers of Mom-and-Pop type stores began using them. By 1999, almost every store was providing them with your purchases. Having largely achieved its goal of getting businesses (and their transactions) on the tax rolls, the government decreased the payout for matching three numbers (the lowest winning ticket) from NT$400 to NT$200. (Sorry, don't remember the year.) It also seemed to decrease the odds of winning. The reduced payouts decreased people's incentive to check their tickets against the list of winning numbers, which led to the appearance of the charity jars. These were still thriving as of a visit last year.

Posted by: SW at Mar 31, 2009 5:03:11 PM

Giving you all receipts with lower amounts of money on them, shop owners will pay less taxes. Well, that definitely is tax evasion.

Posted by: Tax Evasion at Apr 14, 2009 11:42:33 AM

家教
翻譯
醫學美容
汽車報廢
童裝批發

Posted by: 催情性藥品 at Aug 16, 2009 10:58:27 PM

Very interesting post. Thanks a lot. soft play

Posted by: soft play at Nov 10, 2009 11:37:32 AM

Post a comment