« October 1, 2008 | Main | October 3, 2008 »
Sentences to ponder
I think it's very telling that in two days of hearings and two weeks of discussion we have yet to see *any* detailed mechanism for how Paulson's plan will increase the supply of, say, inventory loans.
Here is more, mostly on the commercial paper market, interesting throughout.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on October 2, 2008 at 03:17 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (18)
Assorted links
1. What could $700 billion buy in the developing world?
2. Nobel predictions, via Greg Mankiw
3. The crisis in pictures, via Chris F. Masse
4. Critique of Hubbard and Mayer
Posted by Tyler Cowen on October 2, 2008 at 12:11 PM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (13)
The Economic Organization of a Prison
A famous paper in economics showed how cigarettes became a medium of exchange in a POW camp (even leading to booms and slumps depending on Red Cross deliveries). For a long time cigarettes were the money of choice in American prisons as well but today, according to a great piece in the WSJ, the preferred medium of exchange is mackerel.
There's been a mackerel economy in federal prisons since about 2004, former inmates and some prison consultants say. That's when federal prisons prohibited smoking and, by default, the cigarette pack, which was the earlier gold standard.
Prisoners need a proxy for the dollar because they're not allowed to possess cash. Money they get from prison jobs (which pay a maximum of 40 cents an hour, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons) or family members goes into commissary accounts that let them buy things such as food and toiletries. After the smokes disappeared, inmates turned to other items on the commissary menu to use as currency...in much of the federal prison system mackerel has become the currency of choice.
I loved this point which raised the possibility of significant mack seignorage.
...Mr. Muntz says he sold more than $1 million of mackerel for federal prison commissaries last year. It accounted for about half his commissary sales, he says, outstripping the canned tuna, crab, chicken and oysters he offers.
Unlike those more expensive delicacies, former prisoners say, the mack is a good stand-in for the greenback because each can (or pouch) costs about $1 and few -- other than weight-lifters craving protein -- want to eat it.
Thanks to Brandon Fuller for the link.
Posted by Alex Tabarrok on October 2, 2008 at 12:04 PM in Economics | Permalink | Comments (25)
Net worth certificates, from the FDIC
One alternative is a "net worth certificate" program along the lines of what Congress enacted in the 1980s for the savings and loan industry. It was a big success and could work in the current climate. The FDIC resolved a $100 billion insolvency in the savings banks for a total cost of less than $2 billion.
Here is more. Here is an FDIC summary of the program, under the heading "Other Resolution Alternatives." To the extent bank recapitalization is needed, this is the best way to do it. As Andrew Sullivan will tell you, experience really does matter. I would like to see more economists promote this idea as an alternative to Treasury warrants.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on October 2, 2008 at 08:13 AM in Economics | Permalink | Comments (15)
What will happen with the dollar?
Keith asks, as do others:
I had been curious as to how this whole situation will effect the dollar...If you find the time, I would like to know or see the future of the dollar in this situation.
Please note that I am a "buy and hold" guy, not a trader, and I am certainly not a currency trader. But I'll cover the dollar vs. the Euro.
My inclination is to think the dollar will hold its value. I don't trust any of the macro models of currency values and we do know that purchasing power parity, while very approximate, and exerting its force only in the long run, does not imply a bearish stance toward the dollar.
Here is a list of European banks with assets greater than the gdp of their respective home countries. And read this.
As for this country, the Chinese now regard us as "battle tested." We have been through some truly major bumps, yet no major U.S. politician has called for "not paying back the Chinese." We've even guaranteed the $350 billion in agency securities held by the Chinese central bank and without a stir. I think the Chinese are shocked by that and in many ways they now trust their investments more than before, not less.
The Chinese do not have comparable trust in "Europe." If something went wrong in the financial realm, who would they call up on the phone? Which country? What do they think is the power base of the head of the ECB? What political party does that person belong to? What favors can be traded and with whom? Whose answer would count as definitive? Keep in mind that for all of China's modernity, their leaders are still communist party functionaries.
The negative scenario for the dollar is where the Chinese economy collapses, not where the Chinese become too afraid to buy dollar-denominated assets.
Bush, Bernanke, Paulson -- we call them leaders. The Chinese think of them as the customer service department. I suspect the Chinese get straighter answers from them than we ever do.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on October 2, 2008 at 06:24 AM in Economics | Permalink | Comments (33)
Plans, plans, plans
There is the O'Neill plan:
His plan to deal with the crisis would start with a "discounted cash-flow analysis'' of distressed instruments that are clogging the financial system. The government would guarantee the assets, paring back the support as principal and interest payments were made, he said. "That should take care of the liquidity problem because if they have a government guarantee at a specified level they should trade just like cash,'' O'Neill said.
Or the Soros plan. And here is a "SuperBond" plan to recapitalize the banking system.
And then there is the Phelps plan for capital injection in return for warrants. Not to mention the French plan.
Or how about the Wright plan:
...to let any American with a mortgage swap it out for a government one at 7% for up to 50 years (to get the monthly payment down to where the borrower can handle it). The Treasury will pay off the existing mortgage with bonds (which it can sell cheap right now). If a borrower wants to default instead s/he can do so, and then the lender can mortgage the property on the above terms.
So many plans!
Here are some solar greenhouse plans. And here are Silly Billy's World's Elementary Lesson Plans.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on October 2, 2008 at 06:10 AM in Economics | Permalink | Comments (12)






