« China markets in everything fact of the day | Main | The new Walmart [sic] logo »
Medieval cities: Europe vs. the Arabic world
Cities in the Arab world were on average much larger than those in Europe, and the size of the “primate” city – the megapolis such as Baghdad, Damascus, Cairo or Istanbul – was much bigger; a fact that is indicative of a predatory state and low trade openness. Europe, on the other hand, developed a very dense urban system, with relatively small principle cities. Big cities in Europe were quite often located near the sea, being able to optimally profit from long-distance trade, whereas the largest cities in the Arab world were almost all inland.
The sociologist Max Weber introduced a distinction between ‘consumer cities’ and ‘producer cities’. Using this classification, Arab cities were – much more than their European counterparts – consumer cities.
The classical consumer city is a centre of government and military protection or occupation, which supplies services – administration, protection – in return for taxes, land rent and non-market transactions. Such cities are intimately linked to the state in which they are embedded. The flowering of the state and the expansion of its territory and population tend to produce urban growth, in particular that of the capital city.
In Europe cities are instead much closer to being producer cities. The primary basis of the producer city is the production and exchange of goods and commercial services with the city’s hinterland and other cities. The links that such cities have with the state are typically much weaker since the cities have their own economic bases. It is this aspect that accounts for the fact that Arab cities suffered heavily with the breakdown of the Abbasid Empire, while European cities continued to flourish despite political turmoil.
Between 1000 and 1300 Europe acquired an urban system dominated by typical producer cities, which prospered in spite of Europe’s political fragmentation. In fact, this fragmentation was strongly enhanced by the rise of independent communes – city-states, or cities with a large degree of local authority – which form the core of the political system of Europe’s urban belt stretching from Northern Italy to the Low Countries. Indeed, we still find this pattern in the so-called ‘Hot Banana’ – the industrial agglomeration that stretches from the southern UK to the Netherlands, through Germany and down to northern Italy.
Here is the full article.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on July 2, 2008 at 05:17 AM in History | Permalink
Comments
What is a "principle city"? Never heard of such a thing.
Posted by: Alan Gunn at Jul 2, 2008 8:16:25 AM
IMHO a simpler explanation is that sea routes were more important to European cities and land routes more important to Arabian ones. Weren't the Venetian boats sailing to Arab cities to trade with silk-road caravans? It's easy to grow a large inland producing city where trade routes cross (I live in Atlanta, a good example of a city grown from a major railroad junction).
Posted by: DK at Jul 2, 2008 8:21:15 AM
Istanbul an Arab city?
Posted by: dearieme at Jul 2, 2008 8:30:00 AM
In such discussions, should one also consider the categories of "cities that were originally part of the Roman or Persian empire" vs. "cities that grew up as migratory tribes settled down."
Rome and Constantinople would be prime examples of "consumer cities" that weren't of course "Arab cities."
I wonder how Chinese cities compared to Islamicate cities in this era...
Posted by: BenjaminL at Jul 2, 2008 8:41:24 AM
Inspired by a factoid on the number of prostitutes dying each year in London in the late 18th century (from "Becoming Jane"), can one view cities as sites for the production and consumption of sex, particularly improper sex, and if so, is there a difference between consumer cities and producer cities?
Posted by: Bill Harshaw at Jul 2, 2008 9:16:26 AM
For a peek at an old arab city, visit Fez in Morocco. The original medieval city is still in its center. No cars allowed, but the roads are so narrow that they couldn't drive anyway. Fascinating.
Posted by: liberalarts at Jul 2, 2008 9:34:37 AM
Istanbul, before 1453 was a Byzantian city,
After 1453 it became an Ottoman city. Ruled by Turks, inhabited by many ethnic groups including Turks, Greeks, Armenians, Jews, Romas, Genovese, Jesuits, Bulgarians, Arabs, etc. But it was never an Arab city as far as I know.
Ironically their first reference is to Daron Acemoglu who happens to be an ethnic Armenian from Istanbul.
I don't think the Arabs ever controlled Asia Minor (Anatolia).
Posted by: AB at Jul 2, 2008 10:09:14 AM
So what does it mean that Washington DC is growing and flourishing and Detroit MI is declining? I guess that it means little since Silicon Valley, LA, NY, Chicago and parts of Texas are also flourishing.
Posted by: Floccina at Jul 2, 2008 10:15:26 AM
Considering the fact that Arab trade was largely between the Far East and the West over land routes, is it at all surprising that the largest cities were inland? Also, taking into account the geography in the regions would help as well. Cairo and Baghdad are where they are because they are near major sources of fresh water and fertile land surrounded by desert. European cities don't have those same concerns.
Another thing, what's with including Damascus and excluding Alexandria, which is far bigger? The only reason one would exclude Alexandria is that it completely contradicts the author's thesis.
Posted by: Mo at Jul 2, 2008 10:21:12 AM
I"m suprised at the assertion that major European cities developed on the coasts. Vast coastal areas of Europe were abandoned when the Arab slave trade segued from enslaving Easter Europeans to coastal western Europeans (mainly Iberia, but Italy, France, etc.). The Barbary nations alone enslaved over 1 million europeans and devasted coastal cities and economies over 200 years.
Where are those poor Europeans' reparations, anyway?
Posted by: guy in the veal calf office at Jul 2, 2008 12:17:36 PM
Makes perfect sense to me. You can only sell "consulting services" to the people who grow your food and sew your clothes for so long before you either have to switch to selling "protection services" or doing some growing and sewing yourself.
Posted by: Michael F. Martin at Jul 2, 2008 12:55:36 PM
This particular story ends with >30% of the European population dying from the Bubonic plague carried along those same trade routes. The Arab world was much less affected by said plague.
Posted by: fancythebard at Jul 2, 2008 1:22:40 PM
Tyler,
You should include the name of the author in the posting. Most people aren't going to click on the link.
Posted by: Steve Sailer at Jul 2, 2008 1:42:33 PM
Tyler,
You should include the name of the author in the posting. Most people aren't going to click on the link.
Posted by: Steve Sailer at Jul 2, 2008 1:42:48 PM
Is that why Moscow is so big relative to other Russian cities?
Posted by: Pj at Jul 2, 2008 3:40:36 PM
You forgot to comment on the most important issue: which type of city -- producer or consumer -- would be best for time travelers?
Posted by: Jacqueline at Jul 2, 2008 4:02:10 PM
I just finished "The Great Arab Conquests" by Hugh Kennedy. Kennedy quotes several contemporary sources saying that the Arab capitals were intentionally founded away from the sea, during a period when the Byzantine navy still controlled the Mediterranean.
Of course, that doesn't explain why Cairo, Cordoba, and Damascus remained major metropolises after the point where Arab navies were able to control their local waters.
Posted by: Grant at Jul 2, 2008 4:13:50 PM
Pj: that's almost certainly why Moscow is so relatively big. Look at how the other Russian cities have been shrinking since independence, in some cases drastically. (Of course those were in the Far East, which were artificially enlarged in Soviet times.)
Alan Gunn: I do believe Paulville would be a "principle city."
Posted by: Ned at Jul 2, 2008 10:32:52 PM
Have the authors even glanced at Jane Jacobs? Her landmark work in economy of cities is surely much better basis to jump from than the consumer and producer city used.
Posted by: Mikko at Jul 3, 2008 1:41:28 AM
So what does it mean that Washington DC is growing and flourishing and Detroit MI is declining?
Our economy is shifting from producing manufactured goods, to producing laws.
Posted by: Rex Rhino at Jul 3, 2008 1:59:16 AM
@Jaqueline: Offhand I'd guess that consumer cities (ancient Rome, I would guess, for example) would be better for time traveling to, particularly if you take Tyler's advice and try to work as a minstrel by playing Lennon-McCartney songs. Work as an alchemist/magician would probably also be steadier here, though in Rome another popular form of entertainment (which you'd do best to avoid participation in) was gladiator fights.
The comparison is not a direct one, but which would you prefer to visit now, without time travel: Manhattan, or Gary, Indiana?
Posted by: d.cous. at Jul 3, 2008 10:02:56 AM
@Rex Rhino, Floccina: I don't think that necessarily follows (though it is funny). Logically, the decline of one and the ascension of the other could be totally (or just mostly) independent of one another.
Your explanation (and yes, I know it's somewhat tongue-in-cheek) would work fairly well if you saw a general rule of other cities declining while Washington D.C. expanded, as more of those cities' resources went towards rent-seeking at a federal level.
I think that would only be observable if industries within most cities were highly specialized by city, though (sadly, like Detroit). Maybe it would hold in a mercantilist/oligarchical (feudal) society? I don't know.
Posted by: d.cous. at Jul 3, 2008 10:14:47 AM
"So what does it mean that Washington DC is growing and flourishing and Detroit MI is declining?"
That Republicans are spending money like it's going out of style (and it is)?
Posted by: meter at Jul 3, 2008 3:21:47 PM
We can give you the best Final Fantasy XI gold and best service.
Posted by: Final Fantasy XI gold at Jan 1, 2009 9:05:42 PM
aion gold
aion money
cheap aion gold
cheap aion money
buy aion gold
Mabinogi online gold
Mabinogi gold
buy Mabinogi gold
cheap Mabinogi gold
Mabinogi money
2moons dil
2moons gold
buy 2moons dil
2moons dil
cheap 2moons dil
flyff gold
flyff penya
flyff money
buy flyff penya
cheap flyff penya
cheap flyff gold
Dofus kamas
buy Dofus kamas
cheap kamas
Dofus kama
Dofus gold
Dofus money
Knight online gold
Knight Gold
Knight Noah
Knight online Noah
Posted by: aion at Jul 15, 2009 8:58:23 PM