« At the Beijing Airport | Main | Who is the greatest modern-day thinker? »

Fly to Japan and ease your environmental conscience

Remember the question about the environmental impact of flying?  Air Genius Gary Leff puts it nicely:

If you’re pulling inventory out of a low fare bucket, the strong expectation is that there’s little effect at the margin on your buying the ticket because the airline expects to operate a flight that doesn’t come close to filling up.

If you’re pulling inventory out of a high fare bucket, for coach fares at the extreme end if you’re traveling on a Y fare, you can pretty much expect that the flight will be close to sold out and that the airline is willing to risk displacing another passenger in the short term in exchange for your higher fare… or at least that the ticket cost is high enough to potentially influence behavior on the part of the airline...

Reality is even a little bit more complicated than that. Cargo has to come into play, too. Regardless of what you pay and what fare class you’re booking in, your travel on United between San Francisco and Nagoya, Japan is going to have almost no effect whatsoever on United’s decision-making. They’ve got a very large contract with Toyota and they fill up their 747 with cargo and the flight goes out with very low load factors yet is still profitable for them to operate.

Getting a frequent flyer seat also means that your environmental impact is likely very small.  I am pleased, of course, that I often have Gary booking my seats for me, all in the interests of a cleaner Earth.  The bottom line is that if you get a good deal on price, you should feel doubly good about it.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on June 19, 2008 at 06:13 AM in Economics | Permalink

Comments

Now that you mention it, it's obvious.

Posted by: aaron at Jun 19, 2008 1:26:05 PM

Not to break up the fun, but how legit is it to simply offset your impact and leave it at that?

Posted by: Mercutio.Mont at Jun 19, 2008 5:02:58 PM

I guess a flipside here is that we should feel guilty if we don't fly. Because the plane is going to leave the tarmac whether or not it is full, a half-empty plane seems such a waste of oil, and an unworthy pollutant.

Posted by: rogue at Jun 19, 2008 8:28:32 PM

If one person uses the above logic and decides to fly it won't have a significant effect on greenhouse gas emissions. But if 100, or 1000, or some other large number of people use the same logic, that adds up to a lot of plane flights and a lot of greenhouse gas emissions.

Posted by: Peter Wood at Jun 20, 2008 6:16:49 AM

Damn! Now my email address is on the web - spam here we come...

Posted by: Peter Wood at Jun 20, 2008 6:18:49 AM

If you're getting a very good deal, isn't that a potential indicator that the airline might consider cancelling that flight in the future if it has to offer good deals to a high fraction of its customers.

Posted by: Telnar at Jun 20, 2008 7:13:56 AM

By the same logic, no US presidential election has ever been decided by a single vote (of the populace), so at the margin, why bother to vote in November?

Posted by: Ashish at Jun 23, 2008 10:49:32 PM

A person on her own luggage, leaving the noise of the city, into the 花蓮民宿 arms. To savor the refreshing nature of the original. In Taiwan, as long as a departure from the flow of downtown, everywhere in the garden-like 宜蘭民宿 you, they like their own home Like a warm and comfortable. Taiwan's Lodge 室內設計, the two luxury five-star hotel suite as if the presidential suite general Wah. It is there away.

Posted by: 清境民宿 at Dec 9, 2008 12:25:50 AM

Post a comment