« How do markets set the profit-maximizing level of air conditioning? | Main | Libertarian heresies »

The Education Transformation of China

University education in China is skyrocketing.  In 1996 China had less than 1 million freshmen, in 2006 there were over 5 million freshmen.  The freshman class is continuing to grow and university graduates, of course, are just 4 years behind.  About half of the entering students are in a hard science or engineering program.  As a result, China today produces 3 times more engineers than the United States and will quickly overtake the U.S. in total graduates.
Chinaed
Many people worry about what the Chinese education explosion means for the United States but I am optimistic.  First, as China and other countries grow wealthy the incentive to invest in R&D is increasing.  If China and India were as wealthy as the U.S. the market for cancer drugs, for example, would be eight times larger than it is today - and a larger market means more new drugs for everyone.

Second, the growth in Chinese education is increasing the supply of new ideas and that too is a benefit to people around the world.

Surprisingly, China's education system is being transformed to a considerable degree by private forces.  As late as 1999 the Chinese government paid for most university education but from 2001 onwards tuition and fees account for more than half of total educational expenditures.

I have drawn much of the data in this post from a fascinating new paper, The Higher Educational Transformation of China and its Global Implications by Li, Whalley, Zhang and Zhao.  The paper has much else of interest.

I will be traveling to China to give a talk at Yunnan University in late June and will report on the transformation as it looks on the ground.

Posted by Alex Tabarrok on May 29, 2008 at 07:25 AM in Education | Permalink

Comments

Ummmm - where are the professors coming from to handle the explosive growth? The lab space for the science students? Etc., etc....

More education is not automatically good education.

Posted by: Michael Tinkler at May 29, 2008 8:43:05 AM

Well, there are a lot of Chinese PhDs in the pipeline in the US and elsewhere. Increasingly, they are being tempted to return to China to teach.

I've observed that over the past 10 years, the quality of CS research papers coming from China has improved dramatically. It is not unexpected at all now to see papers from China in the top CS conferences and journals.

Posted by: Anon at May 29, 2008 8:51:11 AM

Tyler says:
As late as 1999 the Chinese government paid for most university education but from 2001 onwards tuition and fees account for more than half of total educational expenditures.

But the abstract says:

Much of the increased spending is focused on elite universities

This is compatible with a relatively few rich families lavishly funding their children's education with the government still funding the vast majority of those new 4 million students educations.

Posted by: MostlyAPragmatist at May 29, 2008 8:52:26 AM

China's graduate cadre as a proportion of total population will still be relatively low, though.

Also, as the UK is finding and as MT notes above, more education is not always good education. We have a target that 50% of young people will have had some exposure to HE by 2010. I have just carried out in-depth interviews with 400 marginal students and, while for some the experience is positive, for many it is seemingly a low grade educational experience that will not really add to the overall the knowledge pool.

Posted by: Tom at May 29, 2008 8:54:28 AM

See "Getting the Numbers Right: International Engineering Education in the US, China and India", at

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1081923

It's among the best efforts I've seen to weigh quality as well as quantity.

Posted by: Monte Davis at May 29, 2008 8:54:53 AM

It's difficult to "see" anything in China these days as you can barely see across the street with the horrible air pollution. And seeding the clouds over Beijing has turned the city from dry and polluted to wet and polluted. But you still can't really tell if its sunny or overcast.

Posted by: asiequana at May 29, 2008 9:03:19 AM

No1 should be afraid of higher education away from USA. It is pushug progress wich is benifit of mankind...
only perhaps the peapole who are slow at adopting new ideas and technologies :D

Posted by: Tomislav Najdovski at May 29, 2008 9:28:17 AM

Yunnan Univ. is an absolutely gorgeous campus - I actually think it's prettier than Peking University. There's a fantastic park right near the school (Cuihu Gongyuan) as well. If the only China you've seen are the big, fairly smoggy, East Coast and Yangtze River cities, you're in for a pleasant surprise in beautiful, beautiful Kunming.

Posted by: cure at May 29, 2008 9:35:10 AM

I'd love to flee Amerika for the fresh air of China and will do so as soon as the Chinese stop smoking and spitting all over the place.

Posted by: Jimbino at May 29, 2008 9:53:39 AM

I'd love to flee Amerika for the fresh air of China and will do so as soon as the Chinese stop smoking and spitting all over the place.

Posted by: Jimbino at May 29, 2008 9:53:52 AM

The amount of plagiarism is unreal, including "papers" complete with web addresses on the bottom and links in the text. As with other new and growing industries there, the initial quality is low. But it is a net positive and they are improving swiftly.

Posted by: 8 at May 29, 2008 11:08:24 AM

Does this article make it seem the U.S.A. is soooo yesterday? Headline from the year 2050: "China seeks measures to stem tide of poor-ass Americans trying to sneak into China for a better life via paddling a leaky door". :P

Posted by: Gil at May 29, 2008 11:15:16 AM

People smoking everywhere + pollution everywhere + skyrocketing university education = lots of new ideas and better technology to treat lung cancer and reduce pollution

Posted by: PJ at May 29, 2008 12:02:27 PM

People smoking everywhere + pollution everywhere + skyrocketing university education = lots of new ideas and better technology to treat lung cancer and reduce pollution

Agreed. Also with their newly enhanced human capital they will have higher incomes with which to finance pollution reduction.

Posted by: happyjuggler0 at May 29, 2008 12:10:11 PM

Nice to see that someone is optimistic for a change about China. Recently returned from China and the speed of change is quite remarkable. There are many challenges not least of which is the challenge to the social fabric of rising income inequality.

Look forward to reading this report.

Posted by: Cassandra at May 29, 2008 12:40:12 PM

Ummmm - where are the professors coming from to handle the explosive growth? The lab space for the science students? Etc., etc.... More education is not automatically good education.

No, but given that a huge chunk of U.S. "education" is about giving people "advanced" degrees for things like womens studies programs where they learn that all heterosexual sex is rape and mathematics and science are patriarchal concepts to keep women down, or Psychology programs where they spend years preparing to do Freudian Psychoanalysis, or get PHDs in Chiropractic or Homeopathic medicine, or law degrees so that they can join in the lawsuit industry, Or history students learning that the people killed in the 9/11 attacks where morally equivalent to Aldoph Eichmann.

The Chinese are actually studying engineering, hard science, medicine, or if they choose a social science they choose more rigorous ones like economics. Even bad science and engineering skills are worth more than a good chunk of U.S. education.

Even during my education at a fairly respectable university (ranked in the top 10 worldwide for engineering), in my political science class we learned as indisputable fact that the CIA assassinated JFK and MLK, that Karl Marxs' economic theories have never been successfully refuted by any economist, and that Ronald Reagan won the electoral vote but lost the popular vote in the 1980 election.

These are extreme examples, but does anyone really dispute that there is a lot of crazy stuff being presented as "education" in the United States? I am more optimistic about China's education system than the U.S. education system.

Posted by: Hungry Crazy Anonymous Antelope at May 29, 2008 1:27:28 PM

I noticed that there was a post on my RSS feed regarding Obama working on his looking-off-to-the-future pose. There was a pointer to Grant McCracken - where it was noted that this information was from an article in The Onion. So, obviously this was not a real story - but the impression in the Marginal Revolution post was that it was in fact a real story.

And now, that post has been removed. Isn't it normal protocol to update the original post as has been done in the past when more information comes to light? As opposed to dropping it altogether? Many people (myself included) read this blog through an RSS feed and would never have known it was a bogus post unless they do some research on their own...which I reckon one should be doing anyway when reading anything on the internet.

Posted by: Joe at May 29, 2008 2:40:35 PM

I'm optimistic, too--for China. There is no economic reason why the best of those Chinese students shouldn't be coming here, possibly to stay, except that:

- Our best schools have no motive to expand their enrollments
- Our nation, as a matter of policy, doesn't want talented foreigners to stay on after graduation
- Even if they could stay, and become permanent residents, we promise to tax them forever for the privilege.

Posted by: M. Hodak at May 29, 2008 2:56:32 PM

"China's statistics may still be inflated because the definition of an engineer can vary widely from province to province. In some cases, auto mechanics are included. "The numbers seem to include anybody who has studied anything technical,""


"India and China are using inflated engineering numbers because they want to draw more foreign investment, while fearmongers in the U.S. use dubious data either to support their case for protectionism, to lobby for greater government spending on higher education and research, or to justify their offshore investments."

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2005/nf20051223_7594_db039.htm

Posted by: j at May 29, 2008 4:12:49 PM

FYI, the numbers I cited are of university students in engineering. To be sure, quality is not controlled for but the point is not the comparison with the U.S. so much as the growth in China.

Posted by: Alex Tabarrok at May 29, 2008 4:17:23 PM

That graph sucks. One could easily set the bottom line to be zero rather than .75 million or so without even changing the scale any.

Posted by: lemmy caution at May 29, 2008 5:53:00 PM

That graph sucks. One could easily set the bottom line to be zero rather than .75 million or so without even changing the scale any.

Posted by: lemmy caution at May 29, 2008 5:53:18 PM

I wouldn't worry too much. What University did Edison go to? The Wright Brothers?

I suspect China is graduating a huge number of future professors of Engineering Physics.

Posted by: Dave at May 29, 2008 7:10:11 PM

Apparently a huge increase in private secondary schools as well. My friend was education prof. at Univ. of Wash. and some of his Chinese former students have launched companies running private secondary schools in China. Time in U.S. is great attraction for these schools, so foundation, travel and U.S. connections are valuable asset.

How many dozens or hundreds or thousands of these private schools are growing in wealthier areas of China?

Posted by: gregory Rehmke at May 30, 2008 11:16:44 AM

Today I had chance to peep on the site Visitthebest. It was informative regarding the best collection of websites

Posted by: Best Education Websites Guide at Jun 17, 2008 5:29:08 AM

Sorry for entering ( intruding! ) late.
There are two kinds of education: One is The mandatory education which is a society's necessity (for which the society must pay for), and Second the investible Education ( which is profit oriented and a part of one's Business process. The Indian government has also withdrawn from the 2nd category, which now stands at the demand (students who can pay) and supply (the business houses who provide services for eventual business profit).

America too does not expect more than 50% of people to go in for latter category, and is content when the local ( societal) responsibility is fulfilled.

I compliment various contributors for excellent knowledge sharing and especially Dave for having raised fundamental querry of what we educators are fulfilling in. The reference is to Edison and his clan.
Schools (teachers) did not appreciate Einstein, Bill gates either.
There are Indians too, cometing for 2nd category. Reference is to late Dhirubhai Ambani

Chiese people are hard working. But DA, BG, were/ are innovators with brains. has education got to do anything with brains is another question?

Priyavrat Thareja

Posted by: Prof Priyavrat Thareja at Jun 20, 2008 1:34:18 AM

Post a comment