« Assorted links | Main | Tuna fish query »
Franco Purini on Tokyo
The minute and the colossal follow one another and clash in a powerful energetic flow that knows no rest, while tangled strips of infrastructure wind between buildings in spectacular spatial combinations. All is bathed in a hazy, dim light, which rarely brightens, and permeates every interstice of the city, from window to window, sign to sign and corner to corner. At night, artificial lighting transforms Tokyo into a fantastical apparition of artificial mountain ranges that glow like braziers. The visual trauma is due to Tokyo giving no sense of any recognizable structure. Compare with Europe, or the West in general, where cities still have a perceptive -- albeit residual and fragmentary -- urban form which is always based on a more or less rational order, in Tokyo you find a randomness in which every urban rule is overturned or negated. Or at least so it seems. As a matter of face, once initial impressions have been overcome, you begin to notice the presence of recurring threads in the urban fabric, first on a subliminal level, than more consciously; a fabric made of multiple, fractal agglomerates of settlements. These agglomerates are groups in self-similar masses, suggesting urban spaces which are not defined by clearly scaled hierarchies or distinct morphological types. Here, urban spatiality seems to feature the unplanned coexistence of architectural units and the incidental contiguity or what is small and large, simple immaterial -- rhythm beats over everything, constituting an amazing unifying element in its almost hypnotic repetition of the same model. In this sense you discover that in the end Tokyo is a simple city that is different from European and American cities only because urban planning is practically absent. If the former are cities of space, governed by the laws of perspective, then Tokyo is a city of situations...in Asia's greatest city you are completely disoriented from the start.
That is in a good book called Tokyo: City and Architecture. I am struck by how much the Tokyo Metro and underground corridors are in fact the defining parts of the city and the most memorable destinations.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on May 24, 2008 at 06:41 AM in Travels | Permalink
Comments
It is not randomness or lack of urban planning that defines Tokyo, which has a great deal of
urban planning, in fact. It is its sheer size. There are many great cities as multi-centered
and apparently random as Tokyo, which are also substantially defined by their underground metro
subway systems. Think of London.
On the matter of sheer size, I was once told in person by the Minister of Housing for the Greater
Tokyo metro area that the true population of it is 40 million, although I have never seen that
figure in print anywhere.
As for fractality of its urban design or structure, that is also not unique to Tokyo and has
been argued for nearly 20 years to be a fundamental feature appearing in many cities. For an
early reference see Michael Batty, Paul A. Longley, and A Steward Fotheringham, "Urban Growth and
Form: Scaling, Fractal Geometry, and Diffusion-Limited Aggregation," Environment and Planning A,
1989, 21, 1447-1472.
Posted by: Barkley Rosser at May 24, 2008 11:50:45 AM
Dear Tyler,
I remember walking down the streets of Tokyo in 1998 and noticing how modern the buildings looked. Then I went, "Duh. Of course. The U.S. government essentially burned the city down during World War II." So it made sense, with the boom that followed for the 30 years after MacArthur left and the Japanese government threw out the Dodge reforms, that buildings would go up in all kinds of styles.
Best,
David
Posted by: David R. Henderson at May 24, 2008 3:53:18 PM
The visual trauma is due to Tokyo giving no sense of any recognizable structure. Compare with Europe, or the West in general, where cities still have a perceptive -- albeit residual and fragmentary -- urban form which is always based on a more or less rational order, in Tokyo you find a randomness in which every urban rule is overturned or negated.
Although the author of the excerpt you quote walks this back a bit, I think it's pretty transparently wrong on its face too -- compare Tokyo with a city like, say LA. Or even London, for that matter. In the central 23 wards, the JR Yamanote-sen (and the Marunouchi-sen) provide a superficial sort of organisation -- a vast loop encircling the heart of the city. Around its periphery, you pass by all the familiar and famous neighbourhoods: the Imperial Palace and Tokyo Station, Ueno Park, Akihabara, Shibuya, Harajuku and the Meiji Shrine, Shinjuku, Ikebukuro, the Tokyo Dome. But these stops aren't just isolated stops -- they fit together like the neighbourhoods of Manhattan, only swollen to immense size. You can walk from Ueno to Akihabara almost entirely through the Ameyoko market, underneath the train tracks. From Shinjuku, you can make your way directly to the Imperial Palace, just walking along Shinjuku-doori. This takes you to the back of the palace grounds. Ikebukuro links to Shinjuku not only by the metro, but by Meiji-doori as well. Shibuya's park, to the north, links to the wood around the Meiji Shrine, and then to Harajuku, which in turn brings you to Aoyama by way of Omotesando. There's a pattern and an organisation there that's not the result of monuments and avenues, but of neighbourhoods flowing one into another.
Even when you reach out to the western districts of Tokyo -- like Kichijouji or Mitama -- the sense of organisation and unity is rather greater than you find with the suburbs of Western cities, like New York or LA. There are secondary and tertiary city centres there in western Tokyo (like Kichijouji, in fact), linked into the fabric of the neighbourhoods around them, rather than set off in vast fortress malls ringed by parking lots, or strip malls by the side of the road.
True, there is a sense in which you can find -- perhaps "randomly," or unexpectedly -- little shopping districts at every turn. In Chiyoda-ku, alongside the offices and the high court and the Otani hotel, and the Diet building, there are little side streets with tiny shops and restaurants and so on by them. But you get this in the best of the old cities, in London, and even in New York. Because people have to eat lunch.
As experienced from the ground, to be frank, I don't think I've been in a city that holds together quite as well as Tokyo. If we are to look for a recognisable structure, wouldn't it be, quite simply, that the city is anchored by the Imperial Palace, the Meiji Shrine, and Shinjuku? Almost everything else (at least that I'm interested in, within the 23-ku) stands in some relation to these focal points, though you may sometimes have to approach sideways.
Posted by: Taeyoung at May 27, 2008 10:41:13 AM
The fact is that among global mega-cities, only a few are more
"planned" than "random." Most of the truly planned ones either
were or are national capitals, such as St. Petersburg or Washington.
There are many that have apparent orders such as rectangular grids
in large sections of their centers, such as Manhatten in New York.
But many have a more organic and fractal pattern that grew spontaneously,
with either ring roads or ring metro lines as in Tokyo, imposing some
sort of order later, and even those with apparent or actual orders will
have the odd street that does not fit the plan because it pre-existed
the city, such as Broadway in New York or Wisconsin Avenue in Washington,
just old country roads, still around.
What is striking about all the great, basically unplanned cities, such
as Tokyo, Paris, London, and Moscow, is that neighborhoods are actually
the remnants of former villages that once upon a time stood by themselves
in the countryside. This is part of what accounts for this occasionally
weird feeling of just that when one encounters a local shopping area or
square, which sometimes is an old village square, now just part of a
great mega-metropolis. And, if one actually lives in one of these
neighborhoods, or stays in one for awhile, one learns this reality, that
many there are the descendants of the people who lived in the area when
it was a village centuries before and are fully aware of this fact, with
all the local loyalty and insider versus outsider mentality that this
entails.
Posted by: Barkley Rosser at May 27, 2008 6:13:52 PM
Many people now use the Internet to do business, after receiving the business should be the best as far as possible, to allow customer satisfaction. But some Internet companies, not to start on your money to begin with, so on and then close the first half, resulting in Juankuan flee. Not only did not complete 租車the project, customers would also like to once again spend money and time to decoration. Dear Customer: This is no guarantee as the company not to find the.
Posted by: 抓漏 at Dec 3, 2008 10:38:57 PM
We can give you the best maple story mesos and best service.
Posted by: maple story mesos at Jan 2, 2009 12:49:47 AM
aion kina
aion online kina
aion gold
aion online gold
buy aion kina
cheap aion kina
aion money
Posted by: aion kina at Mar 18, 2009 4:01:06 AM
it is an important problem
Posted by: anna at May 15, 2009 5:02:47 AM
Is it realistic?
Posted by: kyle at May 15, 2009 5:03:10 AM
It is enlightening!
Posted by: candy at May 15, 2009 5:03:36 AM
Mabinogi online gold
Mabinogi money
Mabinogi Gold
cheap Mabinogi gold
buy Mabinogi gold
2moons dil
2moons gold
buy 2moons dil
2moon dil
cheap 2moons dil
Flyff gold
flyff Penya
flyff money
buy flyff penya
cheap flyff penya
cheap flyff gold
aion gold
buy aion gold
cheap aion money
aion money
cheap aion gold
Dofus kamas
buy dofus kamas
cheap kamas
dofus kama
dofus gold
dofus money
Knight Online Gold
Knight Gold
Knight Noah
Knight Online Noah
Posted by: aion at Jul 8, 2009 9:30:24 PM