« March 28, 2008 | Main | March 30, 2008 »
Assorted links
1. Conformal projections, hat tip to this excellent new blog
2. Who really won the socialist calculation debate?
3. Assigning the blame for subprime mortgage problems
4. We are risk averse like bonobos; in contrast chimps love risk
5. Does capitalism spur cooperation?
Posted by Tyler Cowen on March 29, 2008 at 08:25 PM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (23)
Sangam
That's the new Indian food place in the Food Court, at the Johnson Center at George Mason University. It's excellent, at least so far, thereby making it the first good food at GMU, ever. I'd put it in the top quarter of local Indian restaurants, though I expect time and the crowds to take its toll. The vegetarian sampler is the best dish and they serve Halal food as well. The samosas look overfried. The analytical question is why this took so long to happen, or alternatively why it has happened at all. I have read there is also a wave of innovation in hospital food as well.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on March 29, 2008 at 04:49 PM in Food and Drink | Permalink | Comments (17)
Port-Au-Prince
Posted by Tyler Cowen on March 29, 2008 at 07:58 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (20)
Why capital controls are getting harder to enforce
Here is one lesson, involving Venezuela and Curacao, via William Griffiths.
The "card thing" is an intricate scheme involving local merchants, Socialist bureaucrats, Venezuelan travelers and middlemen.
Trying to slow capital flight, Venezuela limits its citizens to $5,000 in annual credit card purchases abroad. That is 10,750 bolivars, at the official exchange rate of 2.15 to the dollar. But at the prevailing black-market rate of 4.5 to the dollar, the amount more than doubles to 22,500 bolivars.
Seizing on that gap, some Venezuelans began coming to Curaçao's casinos last year and using their credit cards to buy chips. They then played a few hands and cashed in the chips for dollars, which circulate here along with guilders.
Dummy receipts are available too. So, I am puzzled by the generality of Dani Rodrik's defense of capital controls. Internet commerce alone should mean that most capital controls aren't easily enforced. True, not everyone has access to large-scale transactions on the internet, or some companies may be too big and respectable to try to sneak money out of the country this way. But if the enforceability of capital controls is relying on such imperfections in individual optimization, I would suggest that the idea, if it ever made sense in the first place, doesn't have much of a future.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on March 29, 2008 at 04:49 AM in Economics | Permalink | Comments (15)






