« February 27, 2008 | Main | February 29, 2008 »

Forward markets in everything, restaurant edition

Jason Kottke relates:

The Riverdale Garden Restaurant in the Bronx is trying out a novel way of staying in business: they're asking for their regulars to pledge $5000 in exchange for a year of free dinners.

The problem of course is obvious.  First, you probably won't get your money back.  Second, if everyone paid up, the restaurant has a weaker incentive to serve good food.  And which customers do you think will receive the best treatment?  The ones who put up nothing per each meal?

Posted by Tyler Cowen on February 28, 2008 at 02:18 PM in Food and Drink | Permalink | Comments (26)

Suicide fact of the day

Glen Whitman reports:

I went back to the original data source (imagine that!) and found that the stereotype is dead wrong: suicide rates are notably lower for teenagers than adults...Suicide rates do rise throughout the teen years, but they plateau at about age 20 and remain flat throughout the years 20 to 65. Then they jump again for the 65+ demographic.

In case you're wondering, teen suicide rates have not been rising, either. They've been in decline since the late 1980s.

Yet these teens still take the most risks.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on February 28, 2008 at 11:23 AM in Data Source | Permalink | Comments (24)

Which 20th century classic of American conservative political thought has held up best?

We discussed this question over a group dinner Tuesday night.  I opined that none have held up particularly well, mostly because they underestimated the robustness of the modern world and regarded depravity as more of a problem than it has turned out to be.

By stipulation, this universe of books does not include Milton Friedman or pure economics.  It does include Russell Kirk, John Flynn, Richard Weaver, Robert Nisbet, and William F. Buckley, among many others.  You can nominate grumpy Brits and Europeans who settled in the United States, so yes Road to Serfdom is a contender, even though its main empirical point (socialism leads to loss of political freedom) would seem to be refuted.  You can try Albert Jay Nock or Eric Voegelin but Rothbard and Rand do not count as conservatives.  Your answer cannot come before the 20th century, so no Federalist Papers and no Tocqueville.

Leave your answer in the comments and also say why.  At some point I'll offer up my pick as well.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on February 28, 2008 at 07:42 AM in Political Science | Permalink | Comments (97)

Why Plurality Rule is a Bad Voting System

  1. “Falling Slowly” from “Once”*
  2. “Happy Working Song” from “Enchanted”
  3. “Raise It Up” from “August Rush”
  4. “So Close” from “Enchanted”
  5. “That’s How You Know” from “Enchanted”

Discuss.

Posted by Alex Tabarrok on February 28, 2008 at 07:20 AM in Political Science | Permalink | Comments (27)

New roots for the Irish miracle?

By the turn of the century [2000], according to some reckonings, 70 percent of Irish manufactured exports were by US-owned firms...

This was, of course, encouraged by tax breaks and a form of industrial policy.  But part of this process was a shift away from English investment:

Between 1960 and 1970 British-owned companies represented 22 percent of new industrial enterprises in Ireland.  But by 1980 they accounted for less than 2 percent.  Significantly, the proportion of exports to Britain from Ireland halved between 1956 and 1981.

In other words, Ireland found a more complementary economic partner, namely the United States.  The Irish economic miracle is in part the American economic miracle.

That is from the often interesting Luck & the Irish: A Brief History of Change from 1970, by R.F. Foster.  Here is a previous MR post on the Irish economic miracle.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on February 28, 2008 at 06:35 AM in Data Source | Permalink | Comments (12)