« Cloverfield | Main | Is 2008 like 1971? »

Department of "Whatever"

Suffering the gloom, inevitable as breath, we must further accept this fact that the world hates: We are forever incomplete, fragments of some ungraspable whole. Our unfinished natures — we are never pure actualities but always vague potentials — make life a constant struggle, a bout with the persistent unknown. But this extension into the abyss is also our salvation. To be only a fragment is always to strive for something beyond ourselves, something transcendent. That striving is always an act of freedom, of choosing one road instead of another. Though this labor is arduous — it requires constant attention to our mysterious and shifting interiors — it is also ecstatic, an almost infinite sounding of the exquisite riddles of Being.

To be against happiness is to embrace ecstasy. Incompleteness is a call to life. Fragmentation is freedom. The exhilaration of never knowing anything fully is that you can perpetually imagine sublimities beyond reason. On the margins of the known is the agile edge of existence. This is the rapture, burning slow, of finishing a book that can never be completed, a flawed and conflicted text, vexed as twilight.

Eric G. Wilson is a professor of English at Wake Forest University. This essay is adapted from his book Against Happiness: In Praise of Melancholy, being published this month by Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Here is the link.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on January 20, 2008 at 04:41 AM in Books | Permalink

Comments

Oh.
Em.
Gee,

That has to be the biggest gob of mess I've ever read.

Posted by: Student at Jan 20, 2008 5:00:16 AM

Tough times in the English department.

Posted by: Ron Hardin at Jan 20, 2008 5:48:43 AM

Speaking as a naive college student, these sort of "analyses" are why I disdain academic literature and criticism.

Posted by: Billare at Jan 20, 2008 5:55:54 AM

Reminds me of my favorite Kant quote (from Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose):

Without those in themselves unamiable characteristics of unsociability from whence opposition springs-characteristics each man must find in his own selfish pretensions-all talents would remain hidden, unborn in an Arcadian shepherd’s life, with all its concord, contentment, and mutual affection. Men, good-natured as the sheep they herd, would hardly reach a higher worth than their beasts; they would not fill the empty place in creation by achieving their end, which is rational nature. Thanks be to Nature, then, for the incompatibility, for heartless competitive vanity, for the insatiable desire to possess and to rule! Without them, all the excellent natural capacities of humanity would forever sleep, undeveloped. Man wishes concord; but Nature knows better what is good for the race; she wills discord. He wishes to live comfortably and pleasantly; Nature wills that he should be plunged from sloth and passive contentment into labor and trouble, in order that he may find means of extricating himself from them. The natural urges to this, the sources of unsociableness and mutual opposition from which so many evils arise, drive men to new exertions of their forces and thus to the manifold development of their capacities. They thereby perhaps show the ordering of a wise Creator and not the hand of an evil spirit, who bungled in his great work or spoiled it out of envy.

Posted by: Jason at Jan 20, 2008 8:39:13 AM

How about: Department of Wanking. I want those 20 seconds of my life back.

If this were an undergraduate essay, I would say the writer shows some promise, but needs to stop trying so hard. "...an almost infinite sounding of the exquisite riddles of Being" Sounds like it came out of google translate.

Posted by: efp at Jan 20, 2008 10:31:20 AM

To the students:

One of the most depressing artifacts of having achieved a college education and degree is that you'll recognize you are armed with far more questions than answers - if you've been educated properly and were a good student.

And as you progress with further education, you will be exposed to even fewer answers, and far more questions - all the way through the "terminal" degree, as a Phd is referred to.

And at that level, if you've been educated properly and been a good student, you will be humbled by the array of questions there for you to answer and the feeble nature of the tools you are armed with to answer them. All that, with an underlying and acute understanding of the fact there are even more questions we haven't even suspected yet.

Consider that BEFORE you criticize the poets.

Posted by: shayne at Jan 20, 2008 10:33:16 AM

Actually, it's a much better read after translating to Japanese and back:

Suffering in the shadows of the breath as inevitable, we, we must accept the fact that the world hates more: We are forever incomplete, some fragment of the whole ungraspable. Our unfinished nature - we are, but the reality is not always vague pure potential - to a life of constant struggle, sustained and win the war against the unknown. However, in an abyss, this extension of our salvation. Only a fragment is always something beyond one's own efforts, something transcendental. The effort is always free to act on the road instead, choose another one. This is despite arduous labor - our mystical and it is necessary to pay attention to the constant shifts interior - is ecstatic, almost infinite mysteriesつくり上げたexquisite sound.

Happy to accept opposed to the ecstasy. Incompleteness of life is a call. Fragmentation is free. The elation is never complete, you can learn anything beyond imagination sublimities reason incessantly. Margin on the edge of agile presence known. This is the rapture, and the slow burning of a book to finish and never completed, the text of a flawed and conflicted, as twilight vexed.


Posted by: efp at Jan 20, 2008 10:36:31 AM

I rather liked it. Thanks, Tyler.

Posted by: Anonymous at Jan 20, 2008 12:30:57 PM

It works as a kind of prose poetry. I found myself nodding my head in approval. Think of the lyrics to Hotel California or All Along the Watchtower or Stairway to Heaven. Just sit back and enjoy the words and the thoughts and feelings they invoke, and don't fuss too much with sentence-by-sentence analysis. It's not necessary for every piece of writing in the English language to put forth some crisply expressed testable hypothesis or policy statement.

Posted by: at Jan 20, 2008 12:36:42 PM

Try reading 176 pages of that. Ranked #10,000 @ Amazon, but check these:
#12 in Books > Health, Mind & Body > Psychology & Counseling > Creativity & Genius
#12 in Books > Health, Mind & Body > Psychology & Counseling > By Topic > Emotions
#14 in Books > Parenting & Families > Parenting > Emotions & Feelings

Guess the emotion crowd is happy, er -- in a way.

Posted by: David Zetland at Jan 20, 2008 1:51:53 PM

Surely
all this happiness can't be for real. How can so many people be happy
in the midst of all the problems that beset our globe?

Posted by: The Owner's Manual at Jan 20, 2008 2:03:29 PM

read the article before making ignorant comments, people!

Posted by: samson at Jan 20, 2008 2:05:05 PM

Good riddance to melancholy!

Brian Tracy said it best in his book Maximum Achievement:
"The insight that changed my life was the discovery that negative emotions are completely unnecessary and unnatural in the life of man. There is no need for them. They serve no good purpose. They are only destructive. They are the major reason men and women fail to grow and evolve to higher levels of consciousness and character. And you do not have to suffer them at all if you consciously choose to get rid of them."

Posted by: Reginald at Jan 20, 2008 4:45:20 PM

I don't know about "sublimities beyond reason" but the emphasis on reason and progress and accumulating knowledge is one of the distinguishing characteristics of the Christian west. It encourages innovation and improvement as long as freedom to do so is protected. The joy of more leisure and improved living standards that results should not be underestimated.

Posted by: jorod at Jan 20, 2008 6:52:59 PM

Melancholy "poetry" always attracts easy women. Which is good news for this guy, 'cause if he is serious then he should get laid.

Posted by: Woot! at Jan 20, 2008 7:03:32 PM

"It's not necessary for every piece of writing in the English language to put forth some crisply expressed testable hypothesis or policy statement."

Exactly right. This article has had a good impact on my friends and I (mostly non economists incidentally) who have a melancholy temperament. Sure, it is not written as a cohesive set of testable sequiturs. That's not the point. Like poetry it appeals to the heart rather like some parts of The Great Gatsby and other great novels. I can understand what it's saying - that we should accept the struggle of life and embrace the fact that we are never perfectly content or sated as an opportunity for change rather than a great failing. Better that than to be in sedated state of contentedness.

If you don't share the feeling that's fine but don't jump to the conclusion that it's therefore meaningless.

Posted by: Robert Wiblin at Jan 20, 2008 8:38:26 PM

call me shallow, but isn't the writer just saying that the journey and not the destination is the source of happiness? this has got to be the best thread i've ever read.

Posted by: Mike Fladlien at Jan 20, 2008 10:02:04 PM

Poking around this site you learn three things a.) Tyler is a fine economist b.) Tyler is unerring with his
food choices and c.) Tyler has a weakness for post/modern fiction--of the worst sort. Hey two
out of three is o.k.

Posted by: Robert C at Jan 20, 2008 11:39:22 PM

I guess that when translated to economics, this piece says that it is better, for yourself, to work for your money than get it as welfare.

Posted by: GreatZamfir at Jan 21, 2008 6:29:20 AM

you beat me to it, Jason - I though I detected a Kantian strain in that passage...

Posted by: michelle at Jan 21, 2008 12:32:38 PM

Post a comment