« Museo Interactivo de Economia | Main | UK science is becoming "normal" »
Prediction markets at Google
According to the report, “Using Prediction Markets to Track Information Flows: Evidence From Google,” which was presented Friday at the American Economic Association meeting in New Orleans, the strongest correlation in betting was found among people who sat very close to one another, trumping even friendship or other close social ties.
This is tangible evidence, the authors argue, that information is shared most easily and effectively among office neighbors, even at an Internet company where instant messaging and e-mail are generally preferred to face-to-face discussion.
It is an argument, the authors say, for giving greater importance to “microgeography,” or how people interact in the workplace. The finding that information moved fastest among people who were the closest together is also an endorsement of the company’s “third rule for managing knowledge workers: Pack Them In,” the authors say.
And Adam Smith is validated once again:
The other crucial finding of the report was that there was a detectible “optimism bias” among Google employees. That is, results that were good for the company tended to be overpriced, particularly for “subjects under the control of Google employees, such as, would a project be completed on time or would a particular office be opened.”
This optimism was most evident among new employees, the report found, and it was bound to show up on days when Google stock had climbed.
Here is the story. Of course this is very important work. Thanks to Chris Masse for the pointer. Elsewhere in prediction markets land, InTrade has now started conditional prediction markets, which consider oil prices, interest rates, and U.S. troops in Iraq, conditional on who becomes President.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on January 7, 2008 at 07:51 AM in Economics | Permalink
Comments
This seems to be to be relevant to Ed Glaeser's recent paper with Giacomo A.M. Ponsetto about how the decreasing costs of transportation has decreased the comparative advantages of manufacturing cities but increased that of information and idea based cities, which Arnold Kling links to here.
Posted by: John Thacker at Jan 7, 2008 9:16:59 AM
This result sounds depressingly relevant to presidential campaign reporting. See yesterday's Brad DeLong post.
Posted by: John Horowitz at Jan 7, 2008 9:23:44 AM
Just because information travels faster, that doesn't necessarily mean it's correct.
As one who appreciates contrarianism, I see a lot of flaws in going to an extreme based on conclusions of this.
The speed of information flow might be good when it comes to facts, but dangerous when it comes to opinions.
Posted by: Andrew at Jan 7, 2008 9:40:08 AM
"This optimism was most evident among new employees, the report found, and it was bound to show up on days when Google stock had climbed."
As a gut reaction, I could easily interpret this as classic "I think that he thinks that I think that he thinks..."
Posted by: Andrew at Jan 7, 2008 9:42:49 AM
Once prediction markets become more mature, APIs will be available for programs to correct some of these errors if they are indeed pervasive. i.e., "If Google stock rises X%, sell Y% of all contracts".
Sadly, Intrade doesn't look like it plans to mature too much. I hope Inkling will start offering real-money markets.
Posted by: G at Jan 7, 2008 11:20:06 AM
Don't you think the innovation must come from the traders?
By analogy, if we counted on the Nasdaq to provide innovation on discounting corporate earnings, it is much more likely for them to install Goldman-Sachs as chief innovator as opposed to Warren Buffett.
In general, I'm okay with the system being as raw as possible.
Posted by: Andrew at Jan 7, 2008 12:26:42 PM
This is important work for organizational sociology, but not for prediction markets, as this does little to help us find and field high value markets.
Posted by: Robin Hanson at Jan 7, 2008 1:14:22 PM
Andrew,
No, because its far easier for a prediction market to offer an API (like Inkling does), than it is for a trader to make an API for a market that does not have one. I don't, for example, expect a prediction markets to implement a market maker similar to Robin Hanson's, but I do expect a traders and those who manage individual traded contracts to do so once popular markets have APIs available.
Prediction markets with publicly available APIs also allow for easy arbitrage between markets.
Posted by: G at Jan 7, 2008 2:27:46 PM
G, if you're implying that Intrade doesn't have an API, you're wrong.
I have code at http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/amm/intrade_amm.py which uses their API to run an automated market maker that provides liquidity for the conditional prediction markets that Tyler mentioned.
Intrade apparently hasn't put their API documentation on the web, but I suspect they'll send it to anyone who asks.
Posted by: Peter McCluskey at Jan 8, 2008 3:34:01 PM
I saw this presentation too, and two other factors were interesting: affiliation of views among people speaking the same, non-native language and the improved accuracy of veterans (not directly obvious from the observed newbie bias). Overall, Google is getting a lot out of these -- and so are we (social scientists...)
Posted by: David Zetland at Jan 8, 2008 4:32:13 PM
Peter,
Don't you have to pay a significant fee to use their API? The last time I looked at it I believe that was the case.
Posted by: G at Jan 11, 2008 3:39:11 AM
Intrade predicted an Obama win in NH, right up until the results started ticking in. With no small margin, either.
Any thoughts on that?
Posted by: Harald Korneliussen at Jan 12, 2008 5:59:48 PM
Posted by: dddddd at Mar 31, 2008 3:44:59 AM
RXwanted.com has collaborated with confidence and reliable online phar-macy shops, providing brand and generic pre-scription medications at a huge savings for thousands of customers worldwide. http://www.rxwanted.com
Browse online pharmacy store to find drugs from foreign you needed, and order them for discount price. Delivered to the USA! http://www.pharmacyforeign.com
Posted by: online medicines at May 11, 2008 10:28:32 AM






