« Cheap Talk Incentive | Main | Markets in everything »

Frightening abstracts

Many violent relationships are characterized by a high degree of cyclicality: women who are the victims of domestic violence often leave and return multiple times. To explain this we develop a model of time inconsistent preferences in the context of domestic violence. This time inconsistency generates a demand for commitment. We present supporting evidence that women in violent relationships display time inconsistent preferences by examining their demand for commitment devices. We find that "no-drop" policies -- which compel the prosecutor to continue with prosecution even if the victim expresses a desire to drop the charges -- result in an increase in reporting. No-drop policies also result in a decrease in the number of men murdered by intimates suggesting that some women in violent relationships move away from an extreme type of commitment device when a less costly one is offered.

Here is the paper.  Here are non-gated versions.  Or put it this way: when prosecutors cannnot drop the charges against the man, the women are more likely to report the man in the first place, and also less likely to kill the man.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on November 2, 2007 at 11:29 AM in Law | Permalink

Comments

Time inconsistent preferences? :gag: Did a man write this paper? A woman's preferences are entirely consistent. She wants to be with the man she's slept with. Her preferences have to change for her to leave an abusive relationship permanently.

Posted by: Jenny at Nov 2, 2007 2:34:45 PM

Can someone please translate that into English?

Posted by: sa at Nov 2, 2007 3:28:55 PM

Jenny,

The first author listed was a women.

And yes, "time inconsistent preferences" seems a poor explanation for the women's behaviour. That just sounds like withholding various forms of affection (from smiling all the way up to leaving) in response to the man's behaviour. That seems rational, not time inconsistent.

Under my brilliant model, breaking up disfunctional couples (e.g. ones in which the woman must leave for periods to signal her displeasure) via no-drop, etc, obvioulsy leads to less male intimate killing because the bad relationships are forcibly ended.

Of course, having the state terminate all intimate relationships would lead to even less male intimate killing, so I'm not sure what the right policy is.

Posted by: gorobei at Nov 2, 2007 11:14:39 PM

Why is this "frightening"?

Posted by: EclectEcon at Nov 3, 2007 8:48:31 AM

Why is this "frightening"?

Posted by: EclectEcon at Nov 3, 2007 8:49:07 AM

gorobei, this paper seems to be a trivial instance of time inconsistency arising from strategic considerations.

A victim who files charges is vulnerable to intimidation or retribution. The victim would be better off if he could threaten not to drop his charges in the first place (on the hope that the threat will be believed and intimidation will not occur), but the threat is not credible absent a commitment device. This is the well-known rationale for RICO and other criminal racketeering laws.

One real-world analogy is a protester who handcuffs himself to an object, so that he cannot be compelled to move (since he cannot move in the first place).

Posted by: guest at Nov 3, 2007 10:21:03 AM

How do these no-drop prosecutions with a reluctant complainant do in court?

Posted by: Bruce H. at Nov 3, 2007 11:42:28 AM

Guest nailed it.

Yes, time-inconsistent preferences may explain why no-drop provisions generate more reporting.

Essentially, with no-drop provisions, a woman can now promise herself that she won't give in to momentary temptation and take Mr. Slappy back when he says "But, I love you baby." So that would explain the observed pattern.

But as Guest points out, no-drop provisions may also increase reporting because now a woman doesn't have to worry that Mr. Slappy will try to intimidate her to get drop the charges. That would also explain the pattern.

So what's next? Clearly, it'd be good to look at data on assaults of women who've reported domestic abuse, especially shortly after they file charges. That might give us some insight into Guest's "grim trigger" explanation versus the authors' time-inconsistent preferences explanation.

So far, I prefer Guest's theory, for Occam's-razor-like reasons.

Posted by: Keith at Nov 3, 2007 2:56:41 PM

Women aren't the only ones who suffer domestic abuse, and men aren't the only ones who commit abuse.

Posted by: John F at Nov 5, 2007 3:44:54 AM

John F,
No one made those assertions, though the numbers are staggeringly one sided; so what's your point?

Posted by: Ned Williams at Nov 5, 2007 7:24:38 PM

John F,
No one made those assertions, though the numbers are staggeringly one sided; so what's your point?

Posted by: Ned Williams at Nov 5, 2007 7:26:35 PM

How does this square with other recent research that claims that due to no drop policies, fewer women are reporting domestic violence AND the consequence has been an increase in women's deaths?

Posted by: Kathleen Fasanella at Nov 8, 2007 11:18:47 AM

徵信社
徵信
徵信社

Posted by: 鑽石 at Apr 2, 2008 11:07:38 PM

i hope徵信社|徵信社|燈光音響|徵信

Posted by: Alii at Apr 3, 2008 9:58:41 PM

aion gold
aion money
cheap aion gold
cheap aion money
buy aion gold


Mabinogi online gold
Mabinogi gold
buy Mabinogi gold
cheap Mabinogi gold
Mabinogi money


2moons dil
2moons gold
buy 2moons dil
2moons dil
cheap 2moons dil


flyff gold
flyff penya
flyff money
buy flyff penya
cheap flyff penya
cheap flyff gold

Dofus kamas
buy Dofus kamas
cheap kamas
Dofus kama
Dofus gold
Dofus money


Knight online gold
Knight Gold
Knight Noah
Knight online Noah

Posted by: aion at Jul 14, 2009 2:06:06 AM

花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花東旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮,花蓮旅遊行程,花蓮旅遊地圖,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅遊網,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊景點,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,租車,租車,花蓮,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮賞鯨,租車,花蓮租車,賞鯨,花蓮泛舟,花蓮溯溪,花蓮旅遊,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮一日遊,花蓮租車公司,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮一日遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊地圖,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊行程,花蓮旅遊

Posted by: 花蓮租車旅遊資訊 at Aug 8, 2009 4:18:15 AM

吉安慶修院,花蓮七星潭,花蓮旅遊景點林田山,花蓮石藝大街,花蓮鯉魚潭,花蓮太魯閣國家公園,太魯閣砂卡礑步道,合歡山武嶺,花蓮太魯閣九曲洞,花蓮七星柴魚博物館,花蓮漁港,花蓮瑞穗牧場,台東旅遊景點,花蓮玉里安通溫泉,蓮花池步道,花蓮立川漁場,太魯閣國家公園,豁然亭,台東旅遊,七星潭風景區

Posted by: 花蓮租車旅遊資訊 at Aug 8, 2009 4:19:08 AM

花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮租車,花蓮一日遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,租車,賞鯨,花蓮旅遊,花蓮泛舟,花蓮賞鯨,泛舟,溯溪,花蓮租車,花東旅遊,花蓮租車,花東旅遊,花蓮租車,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮美食,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊地圖,花東旅遊,花蓮租車

Posted by: 花蓮租車旅遊資訊 at Aug 8, 2009 4:19:48 AM

Post a comment