« Paul Krugman, pussycat | Main | From the comments »
Books John Nye should read
Since the 1990s the policies of the three major players (Taiwan, China, and the United States) have become unstable in many ways. The possibility of a miscalculation by any participant with respect to the two others is quite high. China thinks that Washington will not sacrifice Los Angeles for Taiwan, the United States that Beijing will not sacrifice twenty or thirty years of development for Taipei, and Taiwan that it can confront Beijing with a fait accompli and not suffer the consequences. Those are three dangerous mistakes.
That is from Therese Delpech's fascinating Savage Century: Back to Barbarism. This book made a splash in France but has been virtually ignored in the U.S. There haven't been many reviews but here are some endorsements.
Two of the book's major themes are a) don't be fooled, the barbarisms of World War II and 20th century totalitarianism are not really behind us, and b) don't expect Asia to be stable in the 21st century. Highly recommended and yes it did remind me of John Nye.
Speaking of John, here is a Reason dialogue with John, covering his new book and also his description of GMU lunches.
Posted by Tyler Cowen on October 10, 2007 at 01:19 PM in Political Science | Permalink
Comments
The potential for a conflict between the US and China over Taiwan is very real. However, Los Angeles is in no danger in any case. China will not launch a nuclear strike against LA because of the thousands of warheads that would fall on China in retaliation. Conversely, the US will never launch a first strike against China for fear of losing LA. Mutual Assured Destruction remains alive and well in the 21st century.
Any war over China will be fought with conventional weapons. At the ragged edge of plausibility, the Chinese might launch a nuclear first strike against the American fleet. However, that isn’t likely and would result in a massive counterstrike against the Chinese armed forces massing (presumably) for an invasion of Taiwan. A very unlikely scenario at best.
Posted by: Peter Schaeffer at Oct 10, 2007 3:01:01 PM
Yes, the danger of a US-Chinese conflict over Taiwan is not nearly as high on the radar
screen of most Americans as it should be. This is a far greater danger than that Iran is
going to get nuclear weapons during the next president's term(s) in office, but mostly we
hear about the latter and not the former, not that there is any obvious way to deal with
the former.
Posted by: Barkley Rosser at Oct 10, 2007 5:14:26 PM
As Napoleon and Hitler learned, islands are very hard to invade. Not only do troops need to get across the water, they need to be supplied. The chances of an actual conquest of Taiwan is low. Beijing's more likely to succeed if it can starve Taiwan through submarine warfare, but that carries its own risks. Even if the US Navy doesn't stop an invasion fleet, it is likely to escort merchant vessels. The US has fought several wars involving issues of freedom of the seas and not recognizing submarine warfare as a legitimate blockade. Would China risk a naval war that appeals to the strengths of the US and the weaknesses of China?
The more important question is whether China will risk war when the certainty of success is so low. There is a small chance of success of a quick victory, a slightly larger chance of a pyrrhic victory, and a large chance of failure. Could Beijing keep the Mandate of Heaven after a defeat in war?
But the point of the book is well taken.
Posted by: Chris Durnell at Oct 10, 2007 6:02:24 PM
this should be obvious, but seems not to be to many people -- history is not over, the world will continue to wax and wane in stability/progress, just because we've had progress for a couple hundred years doesn't mean we won't have collapse and 1000 years of struggling to get back, etc. people seem to overlook the many times when everything seemed settled only to explode, when it was impossible to think the learning/grandeur of the greeks/romans/egyptians/whoever could be lost, that we could regress, etc. happens all the time, will happen again, just about the only safe bet. anyone who thinks different is ignorant (re history) or foolishly optimistic or both.
Posted by: dj superflat at Oct 10, 2007 9:48:41 PM
辦公室傢具
辦公室傢俱
辦公室傢俬
Office Furniture Hong Kong
辦公台
Office Desk
辦公椅
Office Chair
職員椅
Staff Chairs
大班椅
Multi-Function Chairs
文件櫃
Storage Rack
室內設計
Interior Design
會議桌
Conference Table
辦公室屏風
沙發
寫字樓傢俱
寫字樓傢具
寫字樓傢俬
茶几
Posted by: fur at Oct 25, 2007 4:03:30 AM
Posted by: 鑽石 at Apr 2, 2008 10:34:35 PM
aion gold
aion money
cheap aion gold
cheap aion money
buy aion gold
Mabinogi online gold
Mabinogi gold
buy Mabinogi gold
cheap Mabinogi gold
Mabinogi money
2moons dil
2moons gold
buy 2moons dil
2moons dil
cheap 2moons dil
flyff gold
flyff penya
flyff money
buy flyff penya
cheap flyff penya
cheap flyff gold
Dofus kamas
buy Dofus kamas
cheap kamas
Dofus kama
Dofus gold
Dofus money
Knight online gold
Knight Gold
Knight Noah
Knight online Noah
Posted by: aion at Jul 14, 2009 11:25:57 PM
Strange that I was looking up John Nye of GMU and this post was in the top 5. Not really what I was looking for.
Posted by: R. Pointer at Jul 16, 2009 11:08:46 PM
