« No More Making Fun of Canadian Money | Main | The New York Times: gems from the archives »

What I've Been Reading

1. A Nation of Counterfeiters: Capitalists, Con Men, and the Making of the United States, by Stephen Mihm.  This book offers interesting tales of 19th century counterfeiters -- an understudied topic -- but it is too quick to slush together counterfeiters, capitalists, and Herman Melville's The Confidence Man.  I read about 80 pages, some of you will wish to read more.

2. Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism, by Ha-Joon Chang.  This is a less subtle version of the "free trade isn't always best" arguments made by Dani Rodrik.  Reread my post The New Attack on Free Trade.

3. Bill Clinton, Giving: How Each of Us Can Change the World.  Should we resent that this book is essentially a campaign prop for Hillary?  Still, it was better than expected.  It's not deep but it does stress the virtues of commercialization and the profit motive.  Less surprisingly, globalization and micro-finance are portrayed as positive forces as well.

4. Denis Johnson, Tree of Smoke.  The NYT gave it a rave, lead review, as did The Washington Post and other sources.  So far it is being framed as the major American novel of the year.  It's an almost anachronistically modernist in its structure and seriousness.  And is there really anything more to say about the Vietnam War?  First I was bored but then I reread the first 150 pages and now I love it. 

5. Herbert Spencer and the Invention of Modern Life, by Mark Francis.  It's the best intellectual history I've read since McCraw's Schumpeter book, and did you know that he and George Eliot had a non-consummated fling?  It's a highly specialized topic, so I can't recommend this book to everyone but I loved it and no you don't need to care about Spencer the libertarian.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on September 21, 2007 at 06:19 AM in Books | Permalink

Comments

Tyler, I'm reading (well listening to) Giving as well. I agree, it's not very deep but I do like the way Clinton talks about people making a difference outside of the government infrastructure in private organizations and business. It's a good message. I wouldn't be too hard on him. He's championing a way of making a difference that can really work and he should be applauded for that. Granted, he expresses other views along the way that I don't really agree with but I commend him for a genuine concern for the poor and looking to make a difference via private cooperation. Kudos to Billy.

Posted by: John at Sep 21, 2007 12:07:44 PM

Tyler, I'm reading (well listening to) Giving as well. I agree, it's not very deep but I do like the way Clinton talks about people making a difference outside of the government infrastructure in private organizations and business. It's a good message. I wouldn't be too hard on him. He's championing a way of making a difference that can really work and he should be applauded for that. Granted, he expresses other views along the way that I don't really agree with but I commend him for a genuine concern for the poor and looking to make a difference via private cooperation. Kudos to Billy.

Posted by: John at Sep 21, 2007 12:08:28 PM

Regarding Spencer:

I've often thought about who best represents liberalism century by century. In my view, Adam Smith clearly takes the 18th and Hayek clearly takes the 20th.

As for the 19th, I tentatively nominate Spencer. I don't put Spencer in the class of the other two. There is a ridiculousness and pendantry about him. Just less sophicated about social science as a cultural project. Smith was actually best at these highest levels of character and purpose.

Other opinions about the 19th?

I admit that my knowledge and thinking is English-language centric, but I suspect that that doesn't upset the issue.

Posted by: Daniel Klein at Sep 21, 2007 12:48:44 PM

Tyler, I just finished reading Misha Glenny's McMafia: A Journey Through the Global Underworld. I think you would enjoy it. It’s an intriguing look at gray/black markets and how they are affected by globalization. It should be hitting shelves April 2008.

Posted by: Jeff Burkey at Sep 21, 2007 1:11:19 PM

19th century:
Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)

Posted by: liberty at Sep 21, 2007 2:52:34 PM

From my experience in pop philosophy, Spencer comes across as an old, unlikable, cranky man.

Cooler, hip philosophers like William James use Spencer as an example of what's wrong with philosophy and modernity.

Posted by: thehova at Sep 21, 2007 5:04:32 PM

Klein, I'm gonna go with Darwin as the best representative of liberalism.

No thinker has fortified my libertarian values as much as Darwin.

Origin of the Species highlights the importance of diversity/variation. There is a humbleness in Darwin that strikes me as inherently liberal/libertarian. Darwin seems to be telling us to celebrate diversity, because man has no real idea how the world works. Its fruitless to try to master the inner workings of the world. Lets narrow our focus to solving specific problems.

Posted by: thehova at Sep 21, 2007 10:46:23 PM

Hi Best wishes。Allow me to offer my heartiest wishes.xicao loves-流水线娱乐博客常年提供高、中、低压锅炉钢管、流体钢管、结构钢管、化肥专用钢管、石油裂化钢管、地质钢管、液压支柱钢管及合金钢管-无缝管-无缝钢管论文发表资讯/刊物信息,协助客户制定论文发表方案

Posted by: 无缝钢管 at Nov 13, 2007 9:16:58 PM

这家翻译公司|f深圳翻译good深圳翻译公司|优秀同声传译

Posted by: 翻译公司 at Feb 13, 2008 9:33:01 AM

hi,I University majoring in the legal profession.After graduation,I 徵信 the work of the strong interest.Has worked in several徵信社.Has a wealth of experience. Now I immigrants France,Hope to continue to engage in the work of徵信 credit.
now,is to wake up every day to drink 咖啡, shopping. I hope that early awareness of Boles.
thanks,thank very much.

Posted by: Bob at Mar 14, 2008 3:35:01 AM

Post a comment