« My favorite things London | Main | Books that are so good I don't know what to say about them »
Happiness advice from my wife
My wife, a PhD microbiologist, told me once that when she was at work she felt guilty about not being at home with the kids and when she was at home with the kids she felt guilty about not being at work.
This problem may explain a surprising finding from Betsey Stevenson and one of your leading candidates for "most wanted economist blogger," Justin Wolfers. Stevenson and Wolfers have a new paper showing that happiness is up for men but down for women. They write:
By most objective measures the lives of women in the United States have improved over the past 35 years, yet we show that measures of subjective well-being indicate that women’s happiness has declined both absolutely and relative to male happiness. The paradox of women’s declining relative well-being is found examining multiple countries, datasets, and measures of subjective wellbeing, and is pervasive across demographic groups. Relative declines in female happiness have eroded a gender gap in happiness in which women in the 1970s typically reported higher subjective wellbeing than did men. These declines have continued and a new gender gap is emerging—one with higher subjective well-being for men.
One reason is suggested by Stevenson in a NYTimes article on her research with Wolfers and similar independent research from Alan Krueger.
Ms. Stevenson was recently having drinks with a business school graduate who came up with a nice way of summarizing the problem. Her mother’s goals in life, the student said, were to have a beautiful garden, a well-kept house and well-adjusted children who did well in school. “I sort of want all those things, too,” the student said, as Ms. Stevenson recalled, “but I also want to have a great career and have an impact on the broader world.”
Opportunity brings opportunity cost.
In the NYTimes article David Leonhardt correctly notes that "Although women have flooded into the work force, American society hasn’t fully come to grips with the change." Alas, all he has to offer as solution is the usual platitudes about subsidized daycare and how men should do more of the housework - peculiar solutions to women's unhappiness with increased opportunities. Leonhardt should instead have talked to my wife.
As I wrote this post, I asked my wife about her feeling guilty at home and at work but she told me she no longer feels this way. "Really?" I asked, "Why not?"
"I decided to act more like a man and get over it," she responded.
Posted by Alex Tabarrok on September 26, 2007 at 07:20 AM in Economics, History | Permalink
Comments
It does not just happen to women! Take a look at this New Yorker Cartoon:
(http://www.cartoonbank.com/product_details.asp?mscssid=B5ST5AN2E83E9JGEJQ9EASB1M6QJB5WA&sitetype=1&did=4&sid=120707&pid=&keyword=man+sex+work§ion=all&title=undefined&whichpage=1&sortBy=popular)
Posted by: export at Sep 26, 2007 7:41:20 AM
or, from the wonderfulness that is tinyurl:
http://tinyurl.com/yukkrv
Posted by: shawn at Sep 26, 2007 7:51:57 AM
I hereby offer as a prize the contents of my wallet to anyone who can tell me the meaning of life, with the following stipulations:
1)no god
2)no work
3)no kids
these have been tried and rejected.
Posted by: Jeff at Sep 26, 2007 8:06:04 AM
Jeff, I just make do with "fun", which has included kids and work.
But I've heard really good things about heroin.....
Posted by: jens fiederer at Sep 26, 2007 8:49:10 AM
.....unless you ask Cobain.
Posted by: shawn at Sep 26, 2007 10:11:29 AM
How about "other people" ?
Posted by: Affe at Sep 26, 2007 10:32:47 AM
There's a relevant truism (myth? You decide) that says, "no man can be happier than his wife."
Posted by: Johns at Sep 26, 2007 10:33:28 AM
There's a relevant truism (myth? You decide) that says, "no man can be happier than his wife."
Posted by: Johns at Sep 26, 2007 10:34:01 AM
Hugh Heffner?
1.) no god
2.) no work
3.) no kids (unless you count all his girlfriends)
Posted by: at Sep 26, 2007 10:34:24 AM
There's a relevant truism (myth? You decide) that says, "no man can be happier than his wife."
Posted by: Johns at Sep 26, 2007 10:34:50 AM
sorry -- the meaning of life IS kids (ie, genetic success). Without that, you must find an artificial -- and therefore unstable and unfulfilling -- reason to live. That's what gave us philosophy, utility and the three-year car lease. Get over it, acknowledge that we are all useless, and do your best to cope.
I have a counter-argument that women's sex lives have gotten better as they have achieved more choice and control. That's precipitated the current problem with "what to do next?" now that women are not starting families at 20.
Posted by: David Zetland at Sep 26, 2007 10:43:31 AM
sorry -- the meaning of life IS kids (ie, genetic success). Without that, you must find an artificial -- and therefore unstable and unfulfilling -- reason to live. That's what gave us philosophy, utility and the three-year car lease. Get over it, acknowledge that we are all useless, and do your best to cope.
I have a counter-argument that women's sex lives have gotten better as they have achieved more choice and control. That's precipitated the current problem with "what to do next?" now that women are not starting families at 20.
Posted by: David Zetland at Sep 26, 2007 10:44:15 AM
Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.
Posted by: 8 at Sep 26, 2007 11:11:13 AM
Hugh Hefner has a daughter Christie. She runs Playboy Inc.
I really hope women, the superior gender, do not try to find
happiness by imitating us men.
It won't work.
Posted by: save_the_rustbelt at Sep 26, 2007 12:43:23 PM
Hugh Hefner has kids.
Posted by: Katie at Sep 26, 2007 12:54:19 PM
"I hereby offer as a prize the contents of my wallet to anyone who can tell me the meaning of life, with the following stipulations:
1)no god
2)no work
3)no kids
these have been tried and rejected."
Not rejected by me…
The purpose of life is whatever you want it to be..
"Man is a being of self-made soul" to quote Ayn Rand..
I do not believe in God..
I do not have kids
I like my work but hardly consider it my purpose in life..
My purpose in life is to enjoy it..
I read intellectually stimulating blogs..
Finished my PhD last month.. (at GMU.. a great institution)
I have acting class on Mondays..
Going to run the Marine Corp Marathon in a couple of weeks..
Getting married in April…(no kids.. both too old)..
All the things I enjoy most have nothing to do with kids, God, or work..
And I am very happy ( a natural optimist)
How much do you have in your wallet???
Posted by: Geoffrey at Sep 26, 2007 1:23:27 PM
sorry -- the meaning of life IS kids (ie, genetic success). Without that, you must find an artificial -- and therefore unstable and unfulfilling -- reason to live.
You're standing on precarious ground, to say the least, when you start barking ex cathedras about who and who does not "have a reason to live". Different people find their fullfilment in different ways: children, spouse, friends, art, job, leisure, pleasure, charity, politics, and so forth. To assert otherwise is not only insufferably arrogant, but demonstrably wrong. I can go into the General Social Survey and see for myself that children are barely significant (if not detrimental) to subjective well-being, much less the only "genuine" (whatever that means) source of happiness.
Posted by: Jason Malloy at Sep 26, 2007 1:41:42 PM
Fulfillment is not the meaning of life. We are evolved beings, for goodness sake. Our only real purpose is to have large numbers of well adjusted children. Feelings of wellbeing, of self esteem, and the like are paper thick. They butter no parsnips. No matter how much self esteem you have, you and people who share your values will disappear from the world if you do not breed well. Any ideology which pretends otherwise is nothing more than an extinction cult. Aristotle makes this particularly clear. If even western women no longer believe this, and think that "fulfilling careers" as pseudo intellectual economics graduates are the most important thing, then I am afraid that our civilization is rotten to the core, and we are indeed on the brink of a new age of barbarism, presumably Islamic.
Posted by: Rob Spear at Sep 26, 2007 2:17:24 PM
I hereby offer as a prize the contents of my wallet to anyone who can tell me the meaning of life, with the following stipulations:
1)no god
2)no work
3)no kids
I think you should ask those weird guys in Burma who have been on TV lately. They're supposed to know something about this stuff.
Posted by: xx at Sep 26, 2007 2:26:01 PM
Rob above
"western women + "fulfilling careers" leads to "a new age of barbarism, presumably Islamic."
????????
Posted by: Geoffrey Brand at Sep 26, 2007 2:48:49 PM
Unless your ideology reproduces by asexual budding from teachers to students, as economics does.
The current Western civilization is dependent on convincing people to live according to its tenets, not breeding people who will do so automatically.
Posted by: jb at Sep 26, 2007 3:16:58 PM
I'm certianly not old nor wise enough to say that anything is certainly the meaning of life, but I am wise enough to look toward many sources for the answer. Personally, I'm hard pressed to find much that more succinctly hits a pretty good life than Ecc 9:7-18.
Posted by: nelsonal at Sep 26, 2007 4:24:33 PM
The current Western civilization is dependent on convincing people to live according to its tenets, not breeding people who will do so automatically.
You mean like in Iraq?
Posted by: 8 at Sep 26, 2007 4:26:04 PM
Fulfillment is not the meaning of life. We are evolved beings, for goodness sake. Our only real purpose is to have large numbers of well adjusted children.
No. This is a rather dull example of the naturalistic fallacy. Evolution is not a conscious being of some sort, and as such "it" doesn't care if you have children or not. There is no such thing as "The Meaning of Life", there is only what you think about your life, and what others think about your life. (For example, I hope, at the very least, that you live your life in a way that is satisfying to you and doesn't hurt anyone else.) It is up to you to decide what to do with your life, which will presumably be a quest for fulfillment regardless if you choose to focus on a career of some sort, build a large family, or even die painfully for some chosen political cause.
No matter how much self esteem you have, you and people who share your values will disappear from the world if you do not breed well.
Not necessarily since values are not only transmitted vertically through parents, but horizontally through peers, educators, neighborhoods, and the media.
Also, if my values do not include "the ends justifies the means", then "dying out" for failing to act against my own values is actually a good thing, not a bad thing.
Posted by: Jason Malloy at Sep 26, 2007 4:42:49 PM
Dear Jeff:
I think you owe me the contents of your wallet. As any rational atheist knows, the answer is that there is no meaning to life. You exist, that's it. What you make of your time is entirely up to you, hence free will. Make nothing of it, que sera sera.
This peculiar seeking of "meaning" is such a human affliction. Do you see other creatures wandering the earth bemoaning the meaning of their lives? No way, they are out there eating or being eaten.
You can submit my prize c/o Alex Tabarrok. Thanks!
Posted by: A_Female_Brain at Sep 26, 2007 5:55:33 PM
