« American Inventor | Main | Maximum wage laws »

War, Wine, and Taxes

John Nye's new War, Wine, and Taxes: The Political Economy of Anglo-French Trade, 1689-1900 argues that 19th century Britain was not nearly as free trade as is commonly supposed.  Here is one summary of that argument.

Nye also argues that an odd industrial policy, as applied to alcohol, drove the rise of the British nation-state (and thus modernity as we know it).  As a result of the wars of 1689-1713, the British placed very high taxes on French spirits.  British domestic production grew, and to make up for the lost revenue, the British applied heavy domestic taxes to alcoholic production.  The British spirits industry became oligopolistic -- in large part by governmental design -- and the resulting monopolies were a cash cow for their owners and for the government alike.  The taxes on alcohol helped finance the British state on the backs of consumers, without requiring higher taxes on capital or land.

Here is a sample chapter of the book, which promises to be one of the most important works in economic history in recent times.  I am pleased that John will be joining us as a colleague at George Mason this coming year.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on June 30, 2007 at 01:45 PM in History | Permalink

Comments

I don't think many of this blog readers can read Russian. Those who can
may see here http://alex-k.livejournal.com/332754.html one post in the blog
of Russian publisher of economic history Alexander Kuriaev, which dottes
some i's in Russian discussion around Nye and his somewhat questionable conclusions/

Posted by: Victor Agroskin at Jun 30, 2007 3:07:19 PM

Perhaps you can translate the Russian for us, but a crude translation merely suggests that British preferences for Portuguese wine existed before the Methuen Treaty in the 17th century. But I thought the point was that Portuguese wine exports were trivial in comparison to those from France till late in the War of Spanish Succession when they surged rather dramatically. Nye's arguments seem to be about changes in the pattern of imports in the 18th and not the 17th century. The historical criticisms seem more like nitpicking than engagement with the thesis.

Posted by: soldee at Jun 30, 2007 4:11:41 PM

Does this have a connection to the famous wine-cloth example of Ricardo?

Posted by: ponmel at Jun 30, 2007 11:41:34 PM

'[...]and the resulting monopolies were a cash cow for their owners and for the government alike'

How can a monopoly be more revenue-enhancing for the government than a competitive market? In a competitive market, prices are lower and consumption is higher - the level of tax the government can wage on a product before entering price elastic demand territory is higher. Tyler, I think you are wrong here.

Posted by: datacharmer at Jul 1, 2007 9:40:34 PM

Data Charmer,

Much as we'd like it to, the world does not always work by the laws of neo-classical economics. What you say may be correct in a world without transaction costs. However, collecting taxes was not easy in Britain this time (for example, I believe that British property taxes were at one point determined by how many windows you had on your house as this was believed to be a proxy for the home's value. I leave to you what effect this had on house design in Britain).

By granting monopoly/oligopoly licences to only a few and taxing them heavily the British government was able to get around these transaction costs.

Posted by: Old Greg at Jul 1, 2007 10:23:35 PM

Sounds good to me.

Have the entire tax structure replaced by high taxes on narcotics, booze and tobacco.

Much lower compliance costs, and much lower taxes for all except those who choose to indulge.

Posted by: doctorpat at Jul 1, 2007 10:54:16 PM

Old Greg - I take your point, it might as well be true.

Posted by: datacharmer at Jul 2, 2007 11:19:44 AM

world of warcraft gold lotro goldlord of the rings goldlotro powerlevelingrunescape goldrunescape gprunescape powerlevelingrs gold

Posted by: samen at Dec 5, 2007 11:01:21 AM

I come from asia, injoy 室內設計,work in a 搬家公司,other enjoy isecosway科士威,good see U。

Thanks.

Posted by: jack at Jan 6, 2008 9:50:37 PM

Post a comment