« Interview with Robert Fogel | Main | Expand the AMT! »

Who do you want for the GOP ticket in '08 Dr. Cowen?

So asks Chris in the comments.  Right now I don't have favored candidates in any of the parties, either here or abroad.  Furthermore I will deliberately resist developing such favorites, and insofar as I can't help having them, I won't tell you who they are.  I don't mean this in a libertarian "they are all crooks" sort of way, though that may be true.  It still really does matter who governs, and so we should take this process of candidate evaluation seriously.  It is just that I don't want to be part of it.

As a blogger rather than decision-maker I am allowed my small space for protest.  I wish to protest our excessive tendency to choose sides with one group of people rather than another.  I wish to protest excess partisanship, and in particular excess partisanship motivated by the construction of "imaginary good" and "imaginary bad" political personalities.

As biological creatures we are programmed to respond to faces, voices, names, and identities.  We praise them, follow them, condemn them, figure out what side they are on, just like good ol' East African Plains Apes.  Who is not excited to see a President of the United States attending a Wizards game in a nearby box?  I know I was, and I didn't even vote for him.  Chimps will give up bananas, just to be able to gaze at photos of high-status other chimps.

I would like for my posts on MR to be one small space where these necessary but ignoble human tendencies toward personalization are resisted and sometimes even criticized.  I am biased, just as you are.  But for aesthetic reasons I would rather my biases be played out in the realm of ideas, rather than directed at people.  And at the margin, some of you should be just a little more like me.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on April 12, 2007 at 06:14 AM in Political Science | Permalink

Comments

I was fascinated to read about apes prioritizing looking at a high-status ape over actually getting food. Do you have the citation for that? I'd love to learn more.

Posted by: Geoffrey at Apr 12, 2007 7:55:39 AM

...and if a gun was to my head, I would say the guy/gal I think would be best (or least worst) is...

Posted by: Scott W at Apr 12, 2007 8:28:41 AM

I agree that overcoming bias is extremely important, and even that I don't have any strong preferences among the current bunch of candidates, but this seems to be an unusual election in that the candidates are all actually fairly good. Trying to be unbiased between Gore and Bush (or even Gore and Kerry) is (almost exactly) like trying to be unbiased between evolution and creation. A lack of bias should create a very strong convergence of opinion, and moderation, in the face of the available evidence, can only be seen as the result of severe bias or almost incredible ignorance.

Posted by: michael vassar at Apr 12, 2007 9:04:53 AM

The GOP is a thoroughly corrupt party. Any one that they put forward should not have had any dealings with the part since, say 1994.

If it has to be someone who really represents the party how about Ralph Reed.

We would be better off though, if the conservative positons were represented by some new, not irredeemable party.

Posted by: theCoach at Apr 12, 2007 10:05:12 AM

Your decision is wisely reasoned and well put. I think a good followup question is, For those who intend to vote, how should we go about deciding who to vote for? What are the most important issues facing this coutnry and what backgrounds and personality prepare a candidate for presidency?

Posted by: sourcreamus at Apr 12, 2007 11:53:33 AM

Excellent. One reason I don't read newspapers is that they wallow in (and pander to) the ignoble tendencies of which you speak.

Posted by: Daniel Klein at Apr 12, 2007 12:05:12 PM

amen. this is why i dislike politics so much (and don't understand those who don't). it's all so high-school.

Posted by: dj superflat at Apr 12, 2007 12:19:44 PM

oh, and michael? get over yourself. i gather that, from your perspective, there was only one possible choice in our most recent presidential elections (and i can guess which you thought that was). are you really asserting that there were no non-ignorant, non-biased folk who nonetheless voted differently than you did? if so, you've demonstrated that you're the one who's ignorant. put another way, how much arrogance does it take to assume that tens of millions of your fellow countryfolk were all biased and/or ignorant? i take this to be the entire point of tyler's post -- why buy into politics when it so clearly makes people act/think no better than chimps?

(pls note, i'm only calling you out personally because you just effectively said anyone who voted differently from you in 2000 or 2004 was biased and/or ignorant, thereby attacking roughly half of the US voters.)

Posted by: dj superflat at Apr 12, 2007 12:26:27 PM

Bravo! By being non-partisan, you probably doubled your readership. Now, if only we can get certain other economic bloggers to follow your lead...

Posted by: Macneil at Apr 12, 2007 12:44:46 PM

dj superflat,

Also, michael vassar arrogantly insulted the half of Americans who are creationists!

Posted by: Douglas Knight at Apr 12, 2007 1:14:08 PM

I like how several of the comments have proved Tyler's point. Any time you find yourself wanting to claim that anyone who disagrees with you is clearly a malevolent, sub-human idiot: then you've entered the monkey-mind moron zone.

As Tyler said, we all have this. I do, you do, we all do. It's a built in tribal instinct to root for our side and hate, hate, hate the other side.

That's why we have to be aware of this instinct and work to rise above it, especially in the realm of ideas.

It's hard, cause it feels so good to have a truly Evil enemy to revile and hate. To know with a 100% certainty that you are on the side of all things Good and Righteous.

But it's a lie. An enjoyable, intoxicating lie, but still a lie.

Deep hatred of either the Dems or Repubs is no more meaningful than people who despise the Yankees or Red Sox. And intense love of either party is little different from having a crush on a famous actor.

Ah well, it's just human nature.

Posted by: jim at Apr 12, 2007 1:18:56 PM

how much arrogance does it take to assume that tens of millions of your fellow countryfolk were all biased and/or ignorant?

There are more Americans that reject Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection than there are citizens who voted for either candidate in the previous two U.S. elections. Since it's not arrogant to claim that the creationists are all wrong, it need not be arrogant to claim that all those who voted for one candidate were.

Posted by: Pablo Stafforini at Apr 12, 2007 1:23:44 PM

All this overcoming bias talk. Tyler, you have
been having too many lunches with that dangerous
Casanova, Robin Hanson!

Posted by: Barkley Rosser at Apr 12, 2007 1:56:12 PM

Hear hear!

Posted by: Steve Sailer at Apr 12, 2007 2:10:44 PM

The creationism to evolution analogy to the big US parties is a bit silly.

I think creationists are wrong. I don't think they are bad people, just mistaken. I think the impact of their mistakes is pretty small, possibly stunting a few kids intellectual growth in a few school districts.

To say someone is wrong in their voting though is almost impossible. If you mean they are mistaken, you are arguing they end up supporting the candidate who's farthest from their own policy goals.

It's possible, but hard. A good example might be poor people voting for Dems to raise the minimum wage, even though those same poor people are the ones most likely to suffer from such a rise. Most likely though, they are voting for Dems for more and better free govt services, which they will benefit from.

If you just mean they are morally wrong, and that the guy they voted for is somehow just a bad guy, then there's no real way to argue that. The hyper-partisans on each side always think the other candidate is an ultra-devious wolf in sheep's clothing whose success is built on a foundation of lies.

Sounds like you just mean they were wrong not to support your policy preferences. Hey, I wish eviros wouldn't be willing to sacrifice human health, progress, and prosperity for the sake of plants and animals. But they are, and vote accordingly. (That's mainly the activists. The average mildly green voter doesn't believe there is any conflict between health and prosperity, and enviro goals. I think they are underinformed and mistaken, of course. The activists tend to acknowledge the conflict and choose to support the non-human side of things.)

No way to get around people having conflicting policy prefs and conflicting values. And these often come down to basically religious beliefs (like with enviros and creationists)that aren't really subject to rational argument.

Posted by: Jim at Apr 12, 2007 2:48:52 PM

No, creationists are not, typically, particularly bad people in their day-to-day life, but their choice of creationism is the choice to broadcast to the world their willingness to be terrible people if requested by those they see as authorities.

Voltaire said "those who can make me believe absurdities can make me commit atrocities" but I think that in actuality people claim to believe absurdities in order to signal that their loyalty extends to willingness to commit atrocities.

Posted by: michael vassar at Apr 12, 2007 3:04:20 PM

look, i'm not religious, but i'm not sure how you can prove believers are wrong about the existence of god (cf. pascal). moreover, there's all sorts of studies showing that religious folk in the US tend to be very happy, have good communities, live a long time, etc. so regardless of the "truth" of religious beliefs, they are effective in lots of ways. can the same be sad of your scorn for all religious folk? does your scorn for religious folk extend to MLK, gandhi, aretha or stevie? if not, shut up.

Posted by: dj superflat at Apr 12, 2007 5:26:54 PM

why doesn't religious bigotry count as such? isn't the left supposed to be all touchy-feely, relativist, respectful of differing ways of living? don't get me wrong, i think relativism is bunk (stalinism OK? pol pot?). but i can't see how mike's point of view is much difference from garden variety racist thinking? (does he also look down on the dalai lama?)

Posted by: dj superflat at Apr 12, 2007 5:29:39 PM

"Also, michael vassar arrogantly insulted the half of Americans who are creationists!"

Or the half that are evolutionists.

Posted by: Scott Wood at Apr 12, 2007 11:58:08 PM

but their choice of creationism is the choice to broadcast to the world their willingness to be terrible people if requested by those they see as authorities

Michael, as an agnostic, allow me to suggest that you put down the shovel and quit digging. Now you're claiming they're all a step away from fascism or some such? The hole, my lad, is already quite deep enough.....

Posted by: Bernard Guerrero at Apr 13, 2007 1:01:33 PM

liqingchao 07年8月10日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow gold
wow gold
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow power level
wow power level
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
hong kong hotel
hong kong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
rolex replica
rolex replica
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家
搬家
搬家
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
搬家公司
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司

上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
google排名
网站设计
网站设计
多媒体
条码打印机
条码打印机
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
呼叫中心
电话交换机
交换机


熊猫人
熊猫人
熊猫人
熊猫人
熊猫人
熊猫人
熊猫人
熊猫人
熊猫人
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
赵半狄
康王
康王
康王
康王
赵半狄
赵半狄

牙周炎
多媒体
world of warcraft power leveling
四环素牙
wow power leveling
SFP
SFP

wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold

北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold

Posted by: wslmwps at Aug 11, 2007 3:01:50 AM


liqingchao 07年8月14日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling

china tour
china tour
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
鼓风机
风机
风机
货架
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪

超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪
google排名
仓库
仓库
仓库出租
仓库出租
物流园区
物流园区
集团电话
集团电话
四环素牙
口腔常识
口腔常识
口腔医生
口腔医生
网站设计
网站设计
多媒体
监控
监控
监控系统
监控系统
门禁
门禁
门禁系统
门禁系统
搬家公司
搬家公司
条码打印机
条码打印机
牙周炎
牙周炎


牙周炎
多媒体
world of warcraft power leveling
四环素牙
wow power leveling
SFP
SFP

wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold

北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold

Posted by: wslmwps at Aug 14, 2007 4:09:15 AM

吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器

Posted by: hoojk at Dec 2, 2007 9:12:20 PM

大家好,我是臺灣人,從臺灣一個人搬家來到美國,環境很陌生,感覺很孤單。以前在臺灣幾家知名的徵信社工作過,我是一個優秀的徵信工作者,希望早點找到適合自己的工作。希望通過貴站,認識更多的朋友。

Posted by: 謝文豪 at Apr 2, 2008 3:05:37 AM

資金を増やそうとするのに不動産投資をするのが手っ取り早い。日本で不動産で東京 賃貸をさがすのはきわめて難しくシステム開発は日本の会社が良い。

Posted by: 不動産投資 at Jul 19, 2008 1:11:47 AM

出会い
チャットレディ
出会い

Posted by: masinn at Aug 28, 2008 9:44:47 AM

Post a comment