« The Paradox of Libertarianism | Main | My podcast with Russ Roberts »

The Capitalist Vanishes

The I/B/E/S database purports to document the earnings expectations of research analysts.  The database has been used by academic researchers in hundreds of papers and is also used by the industry to rate and promote research analysts. 

A new paper, Rewriting History, claims that there has been massive tampering with the database.   Call it the capitalist vanishes.

Comparing two snapshots of the historical I/B/E/S database of research analyst stock recommendations, taken in 2002 and 2004 but each covering the same time period 1993-2002, we identify 54,729 ex post changes (out of 280,463 observations), including alterations of recommendation levels, additions and deletions of records, and removal of analyst names. The changes appear non-random across brokerage firms, analysts, and tickers, and have a significant impact on the overall distribution of recommendations across stocks and within individual stocks and brokerage firms. They also affect trading signal classifications, back-testing inferences, track records of individual analysts, and models of analysts' career outcomes in the three years following the changes.

Hat tip to Mike Kellermann at the Social Science Statistics Blog.

Posted by Alex Tabarrok on March 12, 2007 at 07:18 AM in Economics | Permalink

Comments

As someone who has never heard of the I/B/E/S database, and only just knows what a "research analyst" is (I think), I'm hoping for some commenters to expand on this. It sounds scandalous. Is it? Does it matter to me? Lazy minds want to know.

Posted by: tom s. at Mar 12, 2007 9:59:09 AM

From Tyler's link: "The systematic collection of earnings estimates is an excellent example of the forces that have been increasing the efficiency of security markets. Before I/B/E/S collected such data, consensus earnings estimates were difficult to obtain and highly ambiguous. Now these estimates are rigorously quantified and widely distributed, decreasing the likelihood of investors acting on incomplete or erroneous information."

This from the man who brought us CAPM and the Sharpe Ratio.

For a novice, does this increase Knightian uncertainty, perhaps?

Posted by: knackeredhack at Mar 12, 2007 10:27:27 AM

I imagine that the authors of all those academic papers based on the IBES database are fairly perturbed by the conclusions of this research. It would seem that a lot of work has been demonstrated to be based on faulty data and therefore fairly useless.

Posted by: Scott Peterson at Mar 12, 2007 10:47:02 AM

Think IBES will use this as a opportunity to correct the data? Or will the sanitized version remain?

Posted by: rmark at Mar 12, 2007 12:15:47 PM

I love this story! IBES grades analysts with its database, major financial publications rank analysts using the database, then analysts get raises and bonuses based on their reputation in the press. Then people are surprised when the "changes" in the database are not random?

What's going on is obvious to anyone who has ever been a TA. It's called "grade grubbing", students lobbying for changes to their grade. You can bet that students never lobby the TA to make their grades lower. They are going to lobby to improve their scores, or if they screwed up they might lobby to drop the class without record. Those are exactly the suspicious changes in the database!

This isn't to say the database is blameless. I think it is a scandal that they don't have some way of correcting problems analysts raise with the database in an impartial way. The accuracy of the database is their job.

The solution I always adopted when teaching was a policy that says if a student asks for something to be regraded because of a mistake or oversight, everything the student had turned in would be regraded simultaneously. There are still sources of "regrading bias", but this strategy eliminates the worst ones.

Posted by: Nathan Whitehead at Mar 12, 2007 1:26:31 PM

I have a pretty good amount of experience using the IBES database and you can back out the original estimates. For each estimate in addition to the date of the earnings announcement, you can see when the analysts made the prediction, and when they revised them. Their are also some stats that track the amount of revisions prior to the announcement of the earnings. I imagine this is what the authors did.

The database is accurate, you can find out what the initial estimates were and the revisions. It just takes some work to extrac.

Posted by: lannychiu at Mar 12, 2007 1:59:16 PM

lannychiu: if you read the paper, you'll see that you're wrong. This is not about analysts changing their minds and correcting recommendations... it's about excising recommendations from the record and adding recommendations that weren't there on the earlier tape.

Posted by: Jonathan at Mar 12, 2007 4:13:41 PM

lannychiu is probably talking about what he can do right now for the previous year.
But the scandal is about someone going in years later and changing the history of what happened several years ago. So the above criticism of lannychiu is on target.

Posted by: spencer at Mar 12, 2007 4:53:33 PM

Actually what I am talking about is a database with every analyst's historical predictions, and a date of when they made them. Their are different versions of the database available, and the more expensive one allows you to search through the data and find the revisions. I don't believe that you can completely excise your bad picks, elsewise the database would be useless for historical back-testing.

Posted by: lannychiu at Mar 12, 2007 5:05:00 PM

You might also be interested in DealBook's post.

Thompson PR and Malloy (one of the authors of the paper) comment there.

Posted by: Nathan Whitehead at Mar 12, 2007 6:23:49 PM


liqingchao 07年8月17日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling

china tour
china tour
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
鼓风机
风机
风机
货架
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪

超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪
google排名
仓库
仓库
仓库出租
仓库出租
物流园区
物流园区
集团电话
集团电话
四环素牙
口腔常识
口腔常识
口腔医生
口腔医生
网站设计
网站设计
多媒体
监控
监控
监控系统
监控系统
门禁
门禁
门禁系统
门禁系统
搬家公司
搬家公司
条码打印机
条码打印机
牙周炎
牙周炎


Posted by: wslmwps at Aug 16, 2007 11:31:39 PM

数控机床数控机床。。
数控改造。。
数控机床。。
数控机床改造。。
数控机床仿真软件数控机床改造。。
数控机床。。
数控机床。。
数控机床。。
数控车床数控车床。。
数控车床。。
华中数控车床。。
大连数控车床。。
无锡数控车床山东数控车床。。
南京数控车床。。
数控车床。。
数控车床。。
广州数控车床数控车床。。
广州数控车床。。
华中数控车床。。
数控车床。。
数控车床北京数控车床。。
数控车床简介。。
教学车床。。
教学数控车床。。
数控铣床南通数控铣床。。
数控铣床。。
数控铣床。。
数控铣床。。
教学数控铣床教学铣床。。
数控机床实训设备。。
加工中心。。
加工中心。。
加工中心加工中心。。
微型加工中心。。
数控加工中心。。
加工中心。。
加工中心加工中心。。
加工中心。。
上海加工中心。。
加工中心

Posted by: 南京北春 at Aug 21, 2007 2:32:54 AM

大家好,我是臺灣人,從臺灣一個人搬家來到美國,環境很陌生,感覺很孤單。以前在臺灣幾家知名的徵信社工作過,我是一個優秀的徵信工作者,希望早點找到適合自己的工作。希望通過貴站,認識更多的朋友。

Posted by: 謝文豪 at Apr 2, 2008 1:39:16 AM

大家好,我是臺灣人,從臺灣一個人搬家來到美國,環境很陌生,感覺很孤單。以前在臺灣幾家知名的徵信社工作過,我是一個優秀的徵信工作者,希望早點找到適合自己的工作。希望通過貴站,認識更多的朋友。

Posted by: 謝文豪 at Apr 2, 2008 1:43:04 AM

大家好,我是臺灣人,從臺灣一個人搬家來到美國,環境很陌生,感覺很孤單。以前在臺灣幾家知名的徵信社工作過,我是一個優秀的徵信工作者,希望早點找到適合自己的工作。希望通過貴站,認識更多的朋友。

Posted by: 謝文豪 at Apr 2, 2008 2:06:06 AM

Please come to cheap shaiya gold, we will give you a great surprise.

Posted by: shaiya gold at Dec 31, 2008 2:59:44 AM

Post a comment