« What do unions do for economic performance? | Main | Africa fact of the day »

Africa

A loyal MR reader asks:

Africa.  What are your long term predictions?  Which policies should rich countries adopt?  Which will they adopt?  What can I do?

My long-term prediction is that Africa will stay quite poor.  Rich countries should offer Africa complete free trade, but the benefits of this move are overrated.  Low productivity, and transport costs and corruption within Africa remain the central problems, not foreign tariffs. 

Libertarians are too quick to say that foreign aid is counterproductive.  Most African governments would be corrupt anyway, and there is usually some positive trickle-down from the aid.  The wastage is massive, and I can understand the desire to stop sending government-to-government aid, but there is a real moral dilemma. 

I also think most of Africa is in a Malthusian trap. That is perhaps the better critique of aid, but alas also of trade as well.  But even within this trap, wealthy foreigners can help make the transition from one steady state to another less painful.  And the trap need not hold in every local corridor.  Plus we are offering a lottery ticket (with what p?) out of the trap.  Malthus doesn't mean we should turn our backs on suffering. 

The intellectual property issues, when it comes to copying drugs, involve an irreconciliable clash between rule and act utilitarianism. 

Africa is a much bigger moral dilemma than most people are willing to admit.  And that moral dilemma appeared pretty big in the first place.

I see some chance that parts of Africa, such as Ghana and Senegal, will escape the Malthusian trap within twenty to thirty years.  That's the most positive prediction I am willing to make.

You can do some good if you are willing to directly administer medical treatments to Africans, in Africa.

Here is an interesting bit:

“Thinking about problems analytically can easily suppress sympathy for smaller-scale disasters without, our research suggests, producing much of an increase in caring for larger-scale disasters”, the researchers said. "Insight, in this situation, seems to breed callousness".

#14 in a series of 50.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on March 7, 2007 at 06:38 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink

Comments

Ghana has come a long way in the last quarter of a century -- when I got a job working on Africa issues in 1981, it was among the most disappointing performers in Africa. Now, it's among the top few. (Of course, it had been among the top few back 50 years ago when it got its independence.)

Posted by: Steve Sailer at Mar 7, 2007 8:37:04 AM

I partly agree with you, but I would like to distinguish between local help by private institutions and welfare programs and what the EU calls "foreign aid". State-sponsoring foreign aid will not help the poor, however, spending money on Doctors without borders, SOS Kinderdörfer and similar institutions is seldom wasted money.
Although I am highly critical of filling the textile market in Africa with cheap "old clothes" from our countries, this might be actually counter-productive.

Posted by: Max at Mar 7, 2007 8:37:59 AM

Heh. You see a chance that parts of Africa will escape the Malthusian trap in 20-30 years...

Econ Forecaster checklist:
1) use "chance", because it is different than "probably" or "will", and whatever happens is consistent with that
2) use "parts", which may be Ghana, but any one of those countries, even regions, would fulfill the prediction
3) "escape the Malthusian trap" is a weak criteria for 'success', GDP per capita greater that $3000/yr?
4) And then, in 20-30 years, which implies it could easily be 40 with the standard errors implicit.

Really going out on a limb!

Posted by: eric at Mar 7, 2007 9:07:12 AM

According to the economic historian Angus Maddison, the continent of Africa had the same wealth level in 1992 that Western Europe had in 1820, the beginning of the era of economic growth.

A quick fix is not likely.

Posted by: monkey at Mar 7, 2007 9:23:57 AM

re: "thinking about problems analytically...."

interesting, but i don't think unacceptable. it's easy to make decisions about individuals' stories: either you believe them or you don't, and with confidence.

when talking about aggregates, though, it's not so easy to make decisions. all that lies, damned lies, and statistics stuff. given that most people aren't incredibly numerate and that there is no shortage of experts and causes, it's hard to decide what's worthy of support and what's not. roughly, it seems like the choice of prejudices is: give more (i.e. be less selective) or give less (i.e. be more selective). can you blame someone for choosing the latter? life is hard enough as it is. it sounds callous, but i don’t think the experts should pooh-pooh the cautious. we're all not rocket scientists.

Posted by: student at Mar 7, 2007 9:29:16 AM

"The intellectual property issues, when it comes to copying drugs, involve an irreconciliable clash between rule and act utilitarianism."

Rule utilitarianism is a sham, for reasons discussed here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_utilitarianism

The IP issues are a clash between a rule and an act, but not between two different types of morality (does the rule -without-exceptions or the rule-with-rare-exceptions-in-cases-this-urgent lead to greater utility?) If you are a utilitarian, the clash is definitely not irrenconcilable, it is simply a matter of measurement. (A tough matter, to be sure).

Posted by: mk at Mar 7, 2007 10:06:39 AM

The wastage is massive, and I can understand the desire to stop sending government-to-government aid, but there is a real moral dilemma.

There is no moral dilemma. I am under no duty to assist Africa, and I shouldn't be taken from to fulfill a duty I don't have.

- Josh

Posted by: Wild Pegasus at Mar 7, 2007 10:24:59 AM

> Rich countries should offer Africa complete free trade, but the benefits of this move are overrated...

What about increased immigration allowances to rich countries? Many rich countries could use the population boost and other benefits that immigrants bring. Plus, immigrants would channel money back home to Africa in the form of remittances, which must be more effective than government-to-government aid.

Posted by: Christopher Monnier at Mar 7, 2007 10:39:38 AM

I, too, feel no moral dilemma or obligation in regard to African politics, health, genocide, poverty, etc. Sympathy, of course. But obligation? Let's examine the implications of that word very carefully before deploying it.

Those of us who feel enough sympathy will support the efficient and effective private programs that help those in need. Those of us who are not inclined to support foreign aid shouldn't be taxed to do so. And those who would tax the rest of us to fund government programs need to examine their own paternalistic claim to a White Man's Burden.

Posted by: anne at Mar 7, 2007 10:50:51 AM

I don't know if the future is that bleak. South Africa is quite well developed (at least compared to its neighbors - Gauteng alone is some enormous percentage of the entire continent's GDP). Some of the island nations (Mauritius in particular) are as well off as SE Asia. My hunch would be that if the birth rate were lower, and the country were able to avoid major graft/civil war, there's no reason the Asian model couldn't work in Africa. It would be interesting to see some country attempt to be the Singapore of some part of Africa, serving as a shipping/infrastructure hub. Tanzania (Zanzibar)?

I'm unconvinced that there's anything special about Africa which prevents its development.

Posted by: cure at Mar 7, 2007 11:18:36 AM

The only real hope I see of increasing the wealth of the majority of poor Africans living in poor African countries over a timescale of decades is some form of neo-colonization by the West.

Posted by: Bruce G Charlton at Mar 7, 2007 11:32:12 AM

Christopher,
Increased emmigration would help the emigrants, so I am all for it, but there will still be just as may poor people in Africa as the population comes to its steady state. Maybe somewhat fewer poor people if the most productive are the ones that left, but this will likely come from an increase in the death rate rather than a decrease in the birth rate, so we can't count it as a win.

AS far as obligation goes, don't read so much pejorative into the term. You personally are under no obligation that stems from some kind of Grand Ethical Law. For me personally, as a human being who is genetically programmed to feel empathy for other human beings, I feel obligated to do something. I just wish I had the slightest clue what to do.

Posted by: josh at Mar 7, 2007 11:36:16 AM

"Although I am highly critical of filling the textile market in Africa with cheap "old clothes" from our countries, this might be actually counter-productive."

This is a broken window fallacy. Any decrease in the textile industry due to the West's "old clothes" will translate to an increase in other sectors, such as water and food.

In general, Africa is the last remnant of what almost all of human history was like before the industrial revolution. As Milton Friedman said, the vast majority of humans throughout history lived in tyranny and misery.

The liberal democratic systems which arose in Western Europe after the enlightenment were one of the first exceptions to this rule. Africa will need countries to attract that kind of liberal democratic system to ever get out of poverty.

Posted by: Matthew at Mar 7, 2007 11:50:24 AM

There is definitely a need for some new ideas on improving the lot of Africa. Foreign aid in it's current form hasn't worked though it has been tried repeatedly for 40+ years. No reason to believe it will miraculously work anytime in the near future.

Posted by: mother theresa at Mar 7, 2007 2:09:23 PM

Perhaps the Chinese, with a smaller dose of lachrymose sentimentality, will strip out the externalities that destroy African economic progress?

Posted by: ChrisP at Mar 7, 2007 3:07:08 PM

Meaningful discussion of (sub-Saharan) Africa is impossible without referring to the cultural factors which most certainly act as brakes on GDP growth - tribalism and high rates of HIV resulting from Africans' failure to monogamise.

Cure these, you cure Africa.

Posted by: Martin at Mar 7, 2007 4:15:34 PM

Spot-on, mk.

Act-utilitarianism (the real utilitarianism) has no quibbles with long-term or complex systemic consequences (except perhaps when it comes to humans that don't yet exist, especially descendants with profoundly different psyches). Tying oneself to a rule is itself an important kind of act.

Rule-utilitarianism doesn't simply mean that sometimes tying oneself to a rule (or creating such an image) creates better consequences than treating individually each instance that would have fallen under the rule. Rather, it means that an instance of following some rule is nevertheless good even if all of the consequences, including long-term ramifications of being seen as a rule-violator, favor breaking the rule.

Posted by: J. Goard at Mar 7, 2007 4:26:00 PM

The only real hope I see of increasing the wealth of the majority of poor Africans living in poor African countries over a timescale of decades is some form of neo-colonization by the West.

Or, more probably, the East.

Posted by: Jason Malloy at Mar 7, 2007 7:43:29 PM

Africa (except for Tunisia, Libya, Djibouti) is a complete waste of time and money.
Tribalism. Ignorance. Political corruption.
The only hope is that AIDS kills everyone and they can start over.

Posted by: Dave Barnes at Mar 7, 2007 10:14:31 PM

“Some of the island nations (Mauritius in particular) are as well off as SE Asia.”

Mauritius is only ¼ African, they are essentially Indian. Seychelles is also predominantly non-African.

A list of the 15 richest African nations is about the most depressing thing you can read. Of the top 15 12 are either tiny country with some oil/diamonds that pump up per capita GDP or somehow majority non-black (in the case of South Africa the economy is non-black)


Equatorial Guinea $16,507 (oil, tiny population)
Mauritius $13,029 (Indian)
Seychelles $12,135 (mixed French, asian, arab, African)
Libya $11,354 (arab, oil)
South Africa $11,035 (white dominate economy)
Botswana $10,866 (diamonds, tiny population)
Tunisia $8,223 (arab)
Algeria $7,095 (arab, oil)
Gabon $6,977 (oil, tiny population)
Namibia $6,658 (minerals, tiny population)
Cape Verde$6,287 (creole)
Swaziland $5,181
Morocco $4,444 (arab)
Egypt $4,282 (arab)
Angola $2,829
Ghana $2,601

So we are left with Swaziland (1 million people, located almost entirely inside South Africa), Angola with some oil wealth, and Ghana as the most successful black African economy, at 2.600$ GDP.

Almost all the development aid to Africa goes to consumption, not investment. Why not just stop giving ineffective development aid (aid is 13% of African GDP today) and start giving some pain-relief consumption aid?

Dave:

I hope you die of AIDS. How about that?

Posted by: Tino at Mar 7, 2007 10:22:40 PM

The only hope is that AIDS kills everyone and they can start over.

Seriously, please go away.

Posted by: Jason Malloy at Mar 8, 2007 12:50:35 AM

The problem of AIDS is serious and affects even the most prosperous african countries.

Consider the case of Botswana, that had an average economic growth of 9% per year, from 1966 to 1999. The life expectancy in 1990 was 60 years; in 2004, 34.

And what's the problem with oil or diamonds?

Posted by: Renato Drumond at Mar 8, 2007 8:34:31 AM

Please, go to hell, Dave.

Posted by: josh at Mar 8, 2007 11:04:21 AM

C'mon Josh, it's ok if someone has an opinion differing from yours.

Relax, you give liberalism a bad name....

Posted by: JoshII at Mar 8, 2007 2:33:36 PM

There are three main factors that influence GDP: Natural resource wealth, economic freedom, and IQ. (evidence here: http://rpongett.phpwebhosting.com/gdp.html )

For sub-Saharan Africa, there are a fair number of nations with natural resource wealth, but almost all have low economic freedom, (botswana is and all have very low average IQs.

So, the fastest way to raise black african wealth would be to increase economic freedom - free trade is something we could do on our end, and we could also bribe or pressure countries into freeing up as well. Neo-colonialism as another commenter suggested would be a more effective but more extreme and costly method.

Ultimately however raising black african IQ is the surest way of ensuring long term stable income growth. It's estimated that about 1/2 of the IQ gap vs. white europeans is due to malnutrition - this can be aided with better infant nutrition, breastfeeding, and economic freedom to aid stability and reduce famine.

The other 1/2 of the gap appears to be genetic, and can only be fixed through either (a) ensuring that higher-IQ black africans reproduce relatively more than lower-IQ black africans and/or (b) as-yet theoretical gene therapy to increase IQ.

Posted by: pwyll at Mar 8, 2007 2:58:18 PM

Whoops, typo. second paragraph should read: "For sub-Saharan Africa, there are a fair number of nations with natural resource wealth, but almost all have low economic freedom, (botswana is one encouraging exception) and all have very low average IQs."

Posted by: pwyll at Mar 8, 2007 2:59:48 PM

How much money would Bono have to raise to just buy out the various African governments? Maybe we could start with a pilot project in, say, Gambia. If it works we could start raising money to buy out larger and larger governments.

Posted by: eddie at Mar 8, 2007 3:58:18 PM

Dave, I also think it would be grand if your fat ass died of AIDS.

Posted by: Jerry at Mar 8, 2007 10:50:53 PM

"C'mon Josh, it's ok if someone has an opinion differing from yours.

Relax, you give liberalism a bad name..."

Sometimes the internet is so frustrating; I want to believe this is a joke. I mean, it definitely seems proper to tell somebody who hopes that AIDS wipes out all of Africa to go to hell. I'm so confused, plus I'm not a liberal at least in the modern sense.

Posted by: josh at Mar 9, 2007 8:21:23 AM

Many people may ask themselves why africa is azone of corruption,but the simple answer is....majority of african people are lying on the poverty line. That will realy explain that many people maynot afford to sustain their daily life.Always where there is poverty ,the survival is not fit enough hence people find the easiest way of escaping this kind of tragedy by either finding out any sort of bribe thus all i can say is that the circumstance has forced them to do.....

Posted by: ahmed at Mar 9, 2007 1:43:30 PM

ahmed for your information your comments are irrelevant infact,you would have said rather below the poverty line not on the poverty line,and no circumstance can force somebody to thrive on corruption,but a good leader would always put his people first before his desires.

Posted by: maskio at Mar 10, 2007 12:27:41 PM

The most compelling explanation I've seen for both the institutional problems and the organizational problems of sub-Saharan Africa is cultural. Specifically, that in most traditionally "black" parts of the continent, there is an ethic of "communal sharing" within family or village that is highly functional for subsistence living but dysfunctional for capital accumulation, specialization, and entrepreneurship. Anyone who starts to become economically successful is expected to, and feels the obligation to, share the gains he/she is making with a large number of family and/or village members, regardless of any reciprocal effort on their part. This belief kills incentives and accumulation. Supposedly, one advantage of moving to a city is that it partly relaxes these obligations by getting away from the family.

Posted by: srp at Mar 11, 2007 8:27:21 PM

I completed a fellowship recently studying Ghana's government and trade restrictions it has to adhere to.
The two factors that are holding Ghana as well as all of Africa back is that their resources are being stolen by the former colonial power(private sector) and the trade policies that have been imposed of these countries by both the IMF and World Bank. Ghana is the #1 exporter of coco which it makes no money from or even uses domesticly yet if they stop growing it they would be in default of their contracts with their lenders. The more development/aid the more debt gets thrown on them. The average American has no clue what its own country is up to.

Posted by: Baker at Mar 11, 2007 10:18:01 PM

I answered this question twice:
http://stonecity.blogspot.com/2007/03/show-your-tongue.html
and
http://stonecity.blogspot.com/2007/03/name-that-tune.html .

Posted by: sammler at Mar 12, 2007 12:22:21 PM


Sex Toys Vibrators

Choosing an Online Adult Sex Toys Shop can be quite overwhelming. With literally thousands of online adult sex toy shop offering an abundance of adult sex toys it can be a very stressful process when all you are looking for is to relieve some stress. There are several key factors when choosing an adult sex toy shop. It's essential that you follow these adult sex toy buying tips to ensure your complete overall satisfaction. The first step in choosing an online adult sex toys shop is how many years has the company been in business.


sex toys vibrators
sex toys vibrators

sextoys vibrators
sextoys vibrators
Penis Extension sex toys
Penis Extension sex toys

sex toys Vibrators
sex toys Vibrators

waterproof vibrators
waterproof vibrators

sex toys vibrators
sex toys vibrators

Too many adult sex toys companies , like other companies are scams or are run by individuals. After being in the adult industry several years, I have personally discovered the better companies are the ones still around. A company's reputation is key, and if you don't mind discussing it with friends, it may not be a bad idea to get adult toy store recommendations so when you buy sex toys. Otherwise if you are too shy, I highly suggest ready adult forums, or adult sex toy forums. These adult toy store forums or adult sex toy blogs are great to get user recommendations. Next choose an adult sex toy shop that offers an abundance of adult products such n lubes, lotions, strap ons, anal sex toys, butt plugs, lingerie, vibrators, dildos etc.

Strap on dildos sex toys
Strap on dildos sex toys

sex toys dildos
sex toy dildos

huge dildos sex toy
huge dildos sex toy

Rabbit Vibrators sex toys
Rabbit Vibrators sex toys

lovedolls sex toys
lovedolls sex toys

This complete adult toy selection will allow you to compare products to ensure it's the perfect toy for you. Make sure you know the adult toy manufacturer names and is made by a reputable adult toy manufacturer. Two major adult toy store are Cal Exotic Novelties and Doc Johnson Sex toys. These two are one of the biggest and most respected names in the adult industry. While, there are others great manufacturers too at least make sure the adult toy store you are buying carries them. Don't get fooled by the price game when buying adult toys.


realistic dildos sex toy
realistic dildos sex toy

sex toy realistic vaginas
sex toy realistic vaginas

anus sex toy
anus sex toy

sex toy Penis Pumps
sex toy Penis Pumps

sex toy Cock Rings
sex toy Cock Rings

Blowjob sex toys
Blowjob sex toys

It's essential you choose an adult sex toys shop for the overall quality and completeness of the site. Make sure that a majority of the links work and are fast loading. This will show you how detailed oriented an adult sex toys shop may be. There you have it. Follow these little tips when buying your adult sex toys and you are on your way to some really great fun. SexToys Vibrators is the leading online adult sex toys shop. America's favorite place to buy sex toys. Sex Toys Vibrators is dedicated to provided the hottest selling adult sex toys and is 100% Discreet and committed to customer satisfaction.


sex toy Masturbators
Masturbators

anal sex toy
anal sex toy

sex toy butt plugs
butt plugs

adult Sex Games
adult Sex Games

adult Lubrication
adult Lubrication

condoms sex toys
condoms sex toys

myspace porn
myspace porn
myspace porn site
myspace porn site
adult myspace
adult myspace
adult myspace
adult myspace
adult social networking site
adult social networking site
adult social networking
adult social networking
adult social networking site
adult social networking site
adult social networking
adult social networking
adult friends
adult friends
adult community
adult community
adult blogs
adult blogs
adult chat
adult chat
adult social networking
adult social networking
adult auctions
adult auctions
adult auction
adult auction
adult online auction
adult online auction
adult video auction
adult video auction
adult toys auction
adult toys auction
adult movie auction
adult movie auction
adult website auction
adult website auction
adult website business
adult website business
turnkey adult website
turnkey adult website
start adult website
star adult website
adult website for sale
adult website for sale
own an adult web site
own an adult web site
auctions adult
auctions adult
erotic lingerie
erotic lingeie
erotic art
erotic art
adult jewlery
adult jewlery
adult novelties
adult novelties
adult books
adult books
used panties
used panties
mens clothing
mens clothing
adult magazines
adult magazines
adult business
adult business
adult services
adult services
tickets online
tickets online
live ticket broker
live ticket broker
sports ticket broker
sports ticket broker
available sports event tickets
available sports event tickets
book theater tickets
book theater tickets
concert ticket broker
concert ticket broker
live concert tickets
live concert tickets
buy concert tickets
buy concert tickets
concert tickets online
concert tickets online
broadway theater tickets
broadway theater tickets
broadway show theater tickets
broadway show theater tickets
sex shop
sex shop
sport tickets
sport tickets
adult toys
adult toys
adult sex toy
adult sex toy
buy adult sex toys
buy adult sex toys

Posted by: toy at Jun 10, 2007 3:47:21 AM

大家好,我是臺灣人,從臺灣一個人搬家來到美國,環境很陌生,感覺很孤單。以前在臺灣幾家知名的徵信社工作過,我是一個優秀的徵信工作者,希望早點找到適合自己的工作。希望通過貴站,認識更多的朋友。

Posted by: 謝文豪 at Apr 2, 2008 1:57:07 AM

Post a comment