« Bloggingheads.TV | Main | Markets in everything, Beethoven edition »

Life Among the Econ

Axel Leijonhufvud's satire of economists, a fun read; excerpt:

The facts (a) that the Econ are highly status-motivated, (b) that status is only to be achieved by making ”modls,” and (c) that most of these “modls” seem to be of little or no practical use, probably accounts for the backwardness and abject cultural poverty of the tribe.  Both the tight linkage between status in the tribe and modlmaking and the trend toward making modls more for ceremonial than for practical purposes appear, moreover, to be fairly recent developments, something which has led many observers to express pessimism for the viability of the Econ culture.

Or try this:

The young Econ, or “grad,” is not admitted to adulthood until he has made a “modl” exhibiting a degree of workmanship acceptable to the elders of the “dept” in which he serves his apprenticeship.  Adulthood is conferred in an intricate ceremony the particulars of which vary from village to village.  In the more important villages, furthermore, (the practice in some outlying villages is unclear) the young adult must continue to demonstrate his ability at manufacturing these artifacts.  If he fails to do so, he is turned out of the “dept” to perish in the wilderness...Once elected an elder, the member need do nothing and will still be well taken care of.

Of course in the mid-seventies the "tribe of Walras" had more status than it does today.  The pointer is from Peter Klein.  Here is another Peter Klein post on economists.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on February 16, 2007 at 06:53 AM in Economics | Permalink

Comments

Didn't I read this in Book III of Gulliver's Travels? ;-)

Posted by: KipEsquire at Feb 16, 2007 8:18:18 AM

It's been a while since I've read Swift but it certainly sounds like it could be taken from there.

At any rate, what's the saying? "It's funny because it's true".

Posted by: AZ at Feb 16, 2007 9:03:17 AM

Fun stuff. Perhaps it's my bias as an economist, but we seem to enjoy satirization of our profession a lot more than most. Are we just that secure, or is our status so defined amongst ourselves that we can just have a laugh when somebody mocks our practices?

Looking on the web, sociology jokes seem rather few and far between. What exactly does that mean?

But it does seem to me that academic economists are so interesting because they understand and like markets but they behave very irrationally from a market perspective. In their hearts, many academic economists are Marxist in the way they judge the value of output based on the difficulty involved in producing it.

Of course, earlier we learned that this is the right way to praise children, so maybe there's something to this after all.


Posted by: Keith at Feb 16, 2007 11:09:33 AM

Fun stuff. Perhaps it's my bias as an economist, but we seem to enjoy satirization of our profession a lot more than most. Are we just that secure, or is our status so defined amongst ourselves that we can just have a laugh when somebody mocks our practices?

Looking on the web, sociology jokes seem rather few and far between. What exactly does that mean?

But it does seem to me that academic economists are so interesting because they understand and like markets but they behave very irrationally from a market perspective. In their hearts, many academic economists are Marxist in the way they judge the value of output based on the difficulty involved in producing it.

Of course, earlier we learned that this is the right way to praise children, so maybe there's something to this after all.


Posted by: Keith at Feb 16, 2007 11:09:34 AM

Awesome. I've been looking for this online for a long time.

Ranks right up there with Blinder's "The economics of Brushing Teeth."

Posted by: joe at Feb 16, 2007 11:12:32 AM

They may be turned out to perish in the wilderness, but most probably find riches and happiness beyond the cheifs wildest dreams :)

Posted by: jim at Feb 16, 2007 12:30:16 PM

You're just now finding this?

Posted by: Jacqueline at Feb 16, 2007 4:53:19 PM

It is a curious comment on the profession that the original
paper by Axel was published in Economic Inquiry. I am aware
of a followup that is equally hilarious, not really at liberty
to say its title or authors, and unfortunately it is not up
publicly available anywhere. I happen to know that the authors
have sent it to several journals, including Economic Inquiry.
Everywhere it has been sent, the editor or editors have declared
it to be hilarious, rolling-on-floor funny, but in the end, nobody
wants to publish it. I might have to break down and invite it to
my journal, just to assuage the honor of the profession.

Posted by: Barkley Rosser at Feb 16, 2007 5:13:36 PM

It is a curious comment on the profession that the original
paper by Axel was published in Economic Inquiry. I am aware
of a followup that is equally hilarious, not really at liberty
to say its title or authors, and unfortunately it is not up
publicly available anywhere. I happen to know that the authors
have sent it to several journals, including Economic Inquiry.
Everywhere it has been sent, the editor or editors have declared
it to be hilarious, rolling-on-floor funny, but in the end, nobody
wants to publish it. I might have to break down and invite it to
my journal, just to assuage the honor of the profession.

Posted by: Barkley Rosser at Feb 16, 2007 5:17:21 PM

Just to clarify this last comment slightly, the reason for all the
coyness is that the paper is currently under review at its fourth
journal, or so I understand, hence the fussiness of the authors.
I think they should put it up publicly, but they have not done so.

Also, in my last sentence, probably a better word than "assuage"
would be "affirm."

Posted by: Barkley Rosser at Feb 16, 2007 5:22:02 PM

Maybe you want to clarify your multiple posts :)

I suspect economists get trashed more is because they are actually respected more; after all, they have real product. Most other "humanities" fields have gone so far off the deep end that nobody bothers to mock them.

Posted by: Foobarista at Feb 16, 2007 5:39:52 PM

Much academic humor depends on expressing the propositional findings or practices of a discipline in an unusual context. (Hence, the joke about the efficient market theorem and the hundred dollar bill.) Those disciplines that lack many propositional findings are correspondingly poorer in humor.

That said, there was a wealth of textual criticism humor in the first half of the 20th century, but it mostly deals with German biblical critics, and has not aged well.

Posted by: Cyurs at Feb 17, 2007 9:47:57 AM

I give up. What's an O'Maitres or O'Metrs?

Posted by: Tracy W at Feb 19, 2007 2:44:06 AM

O'Metrs = Econometricians, I think. (Initially low caste but gaining, heavy digging, landscapes left devastated by random strip mining ... )

Posted by: Christine at Feb 19, 2007 6:10:14 PM

Thanks Christine. :)

Posted by: Tracy W at Feb 20, 2007 8:02:12 PM

大家好,我是臺灣人,從臺灣一個人搬家來到美國,環境很陌生,感覺很孤單。以前在臺灣幾家知名的徵信社工作過,我是一個優秀的徵信工作者,希望早點找到適合自己的工作。希望通過貴站,認識更多的朋友。

Posted by: 謝文豪 at Apr 1, 2008 10:44:17 PM

acer squ-202 battery

Posted by: at Oct 22, 2008 10:06:24 PM

Bvlgari Jewelry
Replica Bvlgari Jewelry
Bvlgari Replica Jewelry
Gucci Jewelry

Posted by: aion kina at Mar 19, 2009 9:09:52 PM

aion gold
aion money
cheap aion gold
cheap aion money
buy aion gold


Mabinogi online gold
Mabinogi gold
buy Mabinogi gold
cheap Mabinogi gold
Mabinogi money


2moons dil
2moons gold
buy 2moons dil
2moons dil
cheap 2moons dil


flyff gold
flyff penya
flyff money
buy flyff penya
cheap flyff penya
cheap flyff gold

Dofus kamas
buy Dofus kamas
cheap kamas
Dofus kama
Dofus gold
Dofus money


Knight online gold
Knight Gold
Knight Noah
Knight online Noah

Posted by: aion at Jul 14, 2009 2:25:42 AM

Post a comment