« Apocalypto, part II | Main | Should we be afraid of hedge funds? »

Why so many long books?

A loyal MR reader writes:

Why are there so many well-padded books out there that really ought to be nice, long articles?

David Sucher has raised similar questions in the MR comments.  The answer is simple: most people don't read the books they buy.  But they like the self-image generated by the book purchase decision, and they like to feel they are getting something for their money.  Driven by market demand, book publishers demand a certain amount of heft and sometimes this means padding.

Yes there is a tendency toward shorter "books," some of which are called blogs.  The price is lower.  Another loyal MR reader once wrote in praise of MR: "if I wanted to read something longer I would read a book or something".  Or not read, as the case may be.

Addendum: Note also that marketing expenditures are more or less constant, relative to the size of the book.  Higher marketing expenditures (definitely the trend) thus spur higher-margin and typically larger books, as suggested by the Alchian and Allen theorem (why buy a big ad campaign for book which sells for a penny?).  For those of us who actually read the books, as book choice goes up, the importance of marketing goes up, and the padding goes up as well.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on December 15, 2006 at 06:26 AM in Books | Permalink

Comments

Tyler, is your answer the same if question is why are there so many long articles, which should be short insightful paragraphs?

Posted by: michael webster at Dec 15, 2006 8:45:17 AM

My read is that trend is toward shorter articles given the space constraints faced by editors and their incentive to publish as many people as possible (also reflected in the number of papers with multiple authors). Most longer articles don't get published. History journals may be willing to publish 75 page papers; most social science journals won't.

Posted by: Andy at Dec 15, 2006 9:32:34 AM

The answer is simple: most people don't read the books they buy. But they like the self-image generated by the book purchase decision, and they like to feel they are getting something for their money.

Wouldn't most people eventually figure out that the longer the book, the less likely they are to finish it? Books aren't cheap, especially hardcovers. "Self image" or not, I don't imagine that many people buy books without intending to read them.

Posted by: Peter at Dec 15, 2006 9:47:15 AM

I think the root problem is that the market price for a book is correlated with its size. I am guilty of this myself. I purchased Rudin's Principles of Analysis for something like $140.00 and I was shocked (shocked!) to discover that it was such a thin volume. Completely free of padding of course, and much more valuable than your typical 600-page textbook full of pictures of smiling college students and useless asides about the biography of Isaac Asimov. But I was expecting something heftier for that price. If people were willing to pay more for thin volumes, then padding would be less of a problem.

Posted by: Sameer Parekh at Dec 15, 2006 10:00:06 AM

Isn't the problem at the production end?

What's better on a resume, having published an article, or a book?

What makes the author more money?

Axiom: inside every dissertation of any value, there is a crisp, concise journal atricle struggling to escape.

Posted by: Anderson at Dec 15, 2006 10:04:03 AM

I have always thought that 100 page books are the best length. If you need more pages you are probably repeating yourself. This semester I was shocked to find that most of the history monographs I went through could have been condensed by cutting out the middle chapters and instead been confined to the introduction, a chapter on evidence, and a conclusion.

Posted by: RWP at Dec 15, 2006 11:23:52 AM

As a (soon to be) published author, I can tell you that a book does more of what I want from the writing than an article ever could. The book gives me more credibility, is easier to use as a platform for publicity, can be sold on my website or in the back of the room when I speak. If I give a copy to a client or prospect, it will sit on his shelf, not be thrown into his trash can.

The more difficult question is why I buy books after having had so many cases of finding that I should have just read the article from which it was expanded. Not sure. Maybe I like to see books on the shelf.

Posted by: Bill Conerly at Dec 15, 2006 12:42:19 PM

Good points from all. As someone who spent 15 years in and around the book publishing biz, can I add a bit of info too?

The bookbiz has shelves to fill. Every season, they're going to publish thousands of new titles. That's simply what the bookbiz is and does. As a consequence, they come up with those books -- many of which should, by all rights, be much shorter than they are. Evvvvvvvveryone in the bookbiz knows that many of the nonfiction books they publish really ought to be article-length. The "article that's been padded out to book-length" has almost become its own genre. Writers are basically product-suppliers, in this view: volunteering and contracting to supply book-length product so the bookbiz can do what it does. Nothing special about a book -- it's just something that gets put on a shelf for eight or so weeks, in the hopes in might sell to someone.

Many more reflections and even some advice
here.

Posted by: Michael Blowhard at Dec 15, 2006 2:58:40 PM

Here is a reason that may or may not apply to lots of cases, but I know applies to at least one, and I think the motives and incentives might apply in others:
1) in nonfiction, if you know a fair amount about a topic and care about it, it is FAR easier to write longer than shorter; thus, in many cases, the author WANTS the book to be very long;
and 2) even if the book turned in is far longer than the proposal said it would be, no one in the editorial end has the interest or energy or will (or has the time given production schedules in which the sales team is already out taking orders for books not yet written) to do what needs to be done, including ordering the author to get tough on herself, to make shorter.

Posted by: Anonymous Author at Dec 15, 2006 7:01:44 PM

I much prefer short concise non-fiction books to the padded ones. Both of my published books are quite short, around 200 pages. I just finished writing the rough draft to my first non-academic book and it is 152 pages. That means it should come in at around 100 pages when published. I think that is the ideal length for a "short history." There used to be quite a few 100 and 150 page books published. Now it difficult to find a general history book with less than 500 pages. In many cases about 300 to 400 of those pages add little to the informational value of the book.

Posted by: Otto Pohl at Dec 16, 2006 2:02:06 PM

In order to get reviewed and get their ideas more widely discussed, a writer will typically have to write a book rather than an article. This results in a lot of books with great ideas but that would have been much better at half the length, including Freakonomics, The Shangri-La Diet, Blink, etc.

Posted by: william at Dec 18, 2006 11:49:21 AM


liqingchao 07年8月21日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling

china tour
china tour
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
鼓风机
风机
风机
货架
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪

超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪
google排名
仓库
仓库
仓库出租
仓库出租
物流园区
物流园区
集团电话
集团电话
四环素牙
口腔常识
口腔常识
口腔医生
口腔医生
网站设计
网站设计
多媒体
监控
监控
监控系统
监控系统
门禁
门禁
门禁系统
门禁系统
搬家公司
搬家公司
条码打印机
条码打印机
牙周炎
牙周炎


Posted by: wslmwps at Aug 21, 2007 1:18:33 AM

資金を増やそうとするのに不動産投資をするのが手っ取り早い。日本で不動産で東京 賃貸をさがすのはきわめて難しくシステム開発は日本の会社が良い。

Posted by: 不動産投資 at Jul 18, 2008 2:42:50 AM

出会い
チャットレディ
出会い

Posted by: masinn at Aug 28, 2008 1:01:13 AM

Bvlgari Jewelry
Replica Bvlgari Jewelry
Bvlgari Replica Jewelry
Gucci Jewelry

Posted by: aion kina at Mar 20, 2009 9:17:24 PM

Post a comment