« Musical profiling | Main | Opposite day: Tyrone on resource pessimism »
Contingent Fees for Julia Roberts (and Erin Brockovich)
Here is more from my debate with Jim Copland on contingent fees.
Movie stars also work on contingent fee (they get paid a share of the gross). Using your argument this causes them to go for films with a low probability of a high payoff – the potential blockbuster that alas is usually a dud. If we regulated fees so that movie stars could be paid only a straight salary that would certainly change how movies are financed. The studios (big law firms), for example, would become more important. A few actors (lawyers) would make less money but the average actor would make more (if you don’t give people a lottery ticket you have to increase their average salary). But would changing how actors are paid really improve the quality of the movies? I doubt it.
If you want better movies there’s only one solid method, attack the source of the problem, and raise the taste level of the public. If the public demands Armageddon that is what they will get. The same is true of improving the tort system – fiddling around with fees won’t do it – we need to address the substantive issues that give judges and juries a taste for bad law.
Posted by Alex Tabarrok on April 11, 2006 at 11:51 PM in Economics, Law | Permalink