« New York City fact of the day | Main | Markets in self-constraint »

How to fix social security

All [social security] benefits are based on something called the primary insurance amount.  This amount, in turn, is based on a worker's earnings, indexed to the growth in average real wages, for the highest 35 years of earnings...So every retiring worker gets to take advantage of overall economic prouductivity, pushing up the level of wages during the time in which the work was performed.  This adjustment allows the purchasing power of benefits to grow over time...the purchasing power of benefits paid to today's teenager are scheduled to be 60% higher than benefits paid to a typical worker who retired in 2001.

...If benefits were indexed to prices, however, Social Security would, at this very minute, be in balance over the long-term - the system would be permanently solvent.  Not only would future revenues equal future costs, but there would be a surplus...

Did you get that right?  Just stop boosting benefits.

That is by Susan Lee, from The Wall Street Journal Op-Ed page, November 23.

Posted by Tyler Cowen on December 1, 2004 at 07:13 AM in Economics | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/3576/1479641

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How to fix social security:

» Social Security Reform from Right Mind
[Read More]

Tracked on Dec 5, 2004 9:28:37 PM

» Crunch Time from Duophony
One distressing piece of news which didn't go unnoticed while I was studying for law school exams, was this big $8.2 trillion alarm from Randall Parker. Just doing a quick once-around of the blogosphere, I read some interesting proposals to... [Read More]

Tracked on Dec 6, 2004 6:35:26 AM

» Can Social Security Be Fixed? Surprisingly, the Answer May Be Yes. from The Big Picture

Wall Street Journal editorial board member Susan Lee "discusses":http://www.socialsecurity.org/daily/12-09-04.html Social Security Reform in a recent op-ed piece. Her observations were a surprise to me. I'd been under the... [Read More]

Tracked on Dec 9, 2004 2:09:19 PM