« Organ Transplants | Main | Status, Stress and Sex Ratios »
Quantum Game Theory, Revisited
My post on quantum game theory ignited something of a firestorm over on crookedtimber.org, where the badly confused Daniel Davies asserts (quite mistakenly) that the quantum mechanism I described allows players to communicate, making it unsurprising that they can beat a coordination game.
The followup posters are in some instances equally confused, though there are excellent responses from several, most notably Glenn Bridgman.
Here's the analogy that I hope will clarify all the issues:
Suppose you and I sit in separate rooms. Once per minute, we each receive a red or green tennis ball through our mailslots. When we look at them, they're always opposite colors. We know this, for example, because we each write down the sequence of colors we see and compare them afterward.
The same thing happens if I wear sunglasses. My vision appears to be affected not a whit, and we always see opposite colors.
Ditto if you wear the sunglasses.
But whenever we both wear sunglasses, we invariably see balls of the same color.
Something very like that happens in quantum mechanics. It works with electrons instead of tennis balls, and the correlations are less than 100%, but in every essential aspect, this is the story.
Notice that we can use this mechanism to win the dog/cat game. (The game again: We are each asked one question: "Do you like dogs?" or "Do you like cats?" . We win if our answers differ, unless we were both asked about dogs, in which case we win if our answers match.) All we have to do is agree to leave off the sunglasses when we're asked about cats, put them on when we're asked about dogs, answer yes when we see a red ball, and answer no when we see a green.
Now it is Daniel Davies's position that there's nothing extraordinary about this; of course we can win--- because we're exchanging information.
But we're not. And for those who think we are, here is my question: You take off your sunglasses (or put them on, as you prefer). A ball comes through the slot. You notice it's red. What information has been exchanged?
Posted by Steve Landsburg on October 22, 2004 at 10:17 PM in Economics, Science | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/3576/1308083
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Quantum Game Theory, Revisited:
» Raining cats and dogs ... from Crooked Timber
One of the least attractive features of Steven Landsburg’s column in Slate was always his habit of assuming that anyone who disagreed with him obviously did so out of ignorance, and indeed that appears to be his response to my... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 24, 2004 3:12:32 PM
» Raining cats and dogs ... from Crooked Timber
One of the least attractive features of Steven Landsburg’s column in Slate was always his habit of assuming that anyone who disagreed with him obviously did so out of ignorance, and indeed that appears to be his response to my... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 24, 2004 3:34:02 PM
» Raining cats and dogs ... from Crooked Timber
One of the least attractive features of Steven Landsburg’s column in Slate was always his habit of assuming that anyone who disagreed with him obviously did so out of ignorance, and indeed that appears to be his response to my... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 30, 2004 5:02:07 AM
» En lite längre länklista from hakank.blogg
Efter en längre tids lågbloggande krävs åter rengöring i Bloglines-tanken. För enkelhets skull har delar av informationstraverseringen lämnats ofullständig. Det kan här nämnas att vid slika lågbloggningstider tenderar aktiviteten på hakank's bloglines ... [Read More]
Tracked on Nov 13, 2004 5:09:13 AM






