« Do we overvalue the difficult? | Main | My New Year´s resolutions »
Competition, Ignorance and Football
Michael Lewis' "Moneyball" shows how Bill James revolutionized baseball by statistically analyzing players and teams. Josh Levin in slate.com asks why this hasn't quite taken off in other sports like football. The key point is that it's easy to isolate to isolate the relationship between certain behaviors in baseball and scoring points. In football, it's a lot harder - people's actions on the football field are all interrelated, making analysis difficult. Thus, a dependable statistical analysis of football has yet to emerge.
This might be an interesting curiosity about the difference between baseball and other sports, but I think there's a broader point about competition and knowledge. The success of statistics in baseball created the opportunity for entreprenuerial behavior by some baseball managers. The introduction of statistics into baseball allowed a few team owners to impose high costs on those who refused to believe that statistics was valuable in sports. This was made possible by baseball's rules - everything centers around a few events (at bats, outs, runs) and it's easy to attribute individual performance to these events.
One might conjecture that some businesses are like baseball - inputs and outcomes are discrete and easy to measure. In those kinds of industries, the creation of knowledge is a low cost activity and those who have the knowledge can easily compete against others, forcing them to accept your analysis of the situation.
Other industries are like football - messy and hard to relate inputs to outpus. In this case, it would be hard to do what Billy Beane did in baseball. I'd guess that success in such industries is characterized by "judgment" - the intuitive understanding of how the industry works built from years of experience. If you don't have that, then you're probably relegated to following "gurus." Seems like a nice explanation of management fads - organizing people is probably a messy business where everything is interconnected, and it's hard to come up with easy to implement rules. Thus, a lot of management behavior revolves around business fads. Readers are encouraged to email me interesting examples of industries or economic activities that are very "baseball"-like or "football"-like.
Posted by Fabio Rojas on December 30, 2003 at 11:48 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c66b253ef00e5508343298833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Competition, Ignorance and Football:
» Making Money the Moneyball way from Infectious Greed
While Moneyball is not writer Michael Lewis's best book (that honor goes to Liar's Poker, followed closely by the underappreciated Trail Fever), it certainly has been the Lewis book that has stimulated the most discussion. The basics: baseball manager ... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 30, 2003 5:00:35 PM
» Football Sabermetrics: Why Not? from Statsology
Slate's Josh Levin asks, Why doesn't football have a Bill James? His answers: football is orders of magnitude more complex than baseball ambiguity regarding the most useful stats to collect 16-game NFL season "leaves less stuff to count" than 162-game... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 30, 2003 11:09:59 PM
» Another sports/business parrallel from Sui Generis
The analogy between business and sports is a well established truism. Check your local bookseller for books on management and you are quite likely to find books by coaches talking about how to get their teams to perform and win.... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 31, 2004 12:09:16 PM